Similar Posts

14 Comments

  1. Do you have any idea that your Kiwibank proposal would cost? I imagine about $10 billion minimum. You are proposing increasing the size of Kiwibank by around 500%, so based on the $2 billion price for the bank as it is, such an increase would require another $10 billion. This would be required to maintain capital adequacy ratios in the bank.
    What is the point?
    There are surely more useful things to spend $10 billion on. For instance, a new hospital at Middlemore and 15,000 new state houses.

  2. Most of the issues we are concerned with are a direct result of the current government, which are just carrying out the previous governments policy. It’s why democracy is no longer a system that serves the people, because almost no-one wants this. I’d like to see an election where either no-one votes, or every vote is invalid. See how they spin it as being “legitimate”.

  3. Kiwi Bank has been a failure thus far. Market share is extremely low. It is under capitalised and doesn’t perform many functions expected of a trading bank. There are better uses of tax payer money than recapitalising Kiwi Bank which has failed to attract public support thus far and has not been a commercial success to date. Government has the power to regulate the “Australian” banks and that is a much simpler and more cost effective way to achieve aims!

Comments are closed.