Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

13 Comments

  1. I do not usually agree with much of John Minto thinking but good on him for keeping the blowtorch on this Labour government. I am sure many that have supported Labour in the past are shaking their heads in disbelief of their actions of late.
    Many of these events are carried out in the governments name by faceless so called public servants but it falls to their political masters to keep them in line . Where is this leadership ? The list of failed ministers is large and at some stage Jacinda needs to show some metal and kick arse instead of trying to smile her may out of troublesome media interviews

  2. In answer to your two questions John….
    1. Labours phone seems to be off the hook in both directions!
    It is more than sad, it is tragic what has happened to what used to be (pre 1984) a left wing Party.
    2.Yes, they will continue to pander the Middle through poll driven decisions to get re-elected.

    If Labour don’t change their current course I predict a landslide to National to be able to govern on its own and not need Act.
    As much as I abhor National, and will never support any right wing party, I must admit I am surprised how well Luxon has greased his way in to being accepted and has become very media savy.

    AS Dick Dastardly was so good at saying “Do something Muttley”. Wake up Labour.

  3. Actually the leftie woke have just as much to blame for NZ’s high prices and growing homelessness, because they believed the mantra of build, build, build more houses and it was a supply led problem not a demand led problem.

    Labeen (liked the Natz before them) stopped everything, deregulated the zoning laws, allowed people traffickers to bring in thousands of migrant labourers without jobs who could not speak the language and often paid a lot of money to come to NZ (inspire of knowing there was a big problem government still allowed hundreds of thousands of these work or student visas), then without work the woke demanded everyone stay in NZ instead of prosecuting the people traffickers and stopping the practise and compensating the migrant workers from the proceeds of crime of the people traffickers.

    Now we have plenty of warm, dry, new houses. Problem is nobody can afford them apart from rich first home buyers from overseas!

    Apartment 2 beds, 2 baths, 80m2, 1 parking and Asking price $2,150,000
    https://www.trademe.co.nz/a/property/new-homes/new-apartment/auckland/auckland-city/grey-lynn/listing/3507840035

    Apartment 2 beds, 1 bath, 63m2, 1 parking Asking price $1,250,000
    https://www.trademe.co.nz/a/property/new-homes/new-apartment/auckland/auckland-city/grey-lynn/listing/3498250626

    Then there is the council rates, insurance and body corporate on top!

    Before the woke got in league with the righties with ‘warm, dry, housing’ mantra, people used to pay less that for a 3 bedroom family property less than 5 years ago! How are families supposed to live in 63m2?

    Imagine what the rents will be like, (although on those prices who would be able to rent them out) but luckily being a new build a landlord will get a tax break on it, and it can most probably be owned by an overseas landlord.

    Then there are all the people losing their life savings on leaky buildings on apartments.
    Residents of Mount Maunganui’s Calais Mount Resort face $11m upgrade bill
    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/residents-of-mount-maunganuis-calais-mount-resort-face-11m-upgrade-bill/INP4O5JFWDRDSLTIPZNMSJR4DY/

    Between the multimillion dollar new apartments and the multimillion dollar repairs on the old apartments, NZ renters via government paying for it, seem to be paying even more for emergency housing or motels.

    Sadly the woke cancelled everything on a whim as they hated the middle class so much, and without much of plan seemed to have created a much bigger problem.

    The woke got their way, and cancelled the affordable family home as it was not good enough for their woke sensibilities.

    1. Now the richest developers are buying up South Auckland – they finished making the rest of Auckland unaffordable!

      ‘Lockdown project’: NZ’s richest man Graeme Hart starts on Auckland house-buying spree
      https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/lockdown-project-nzs-richest-man-graeme-hart-starts-on-auckland-house-buying-spree/GJTJX2BUJQCWQGKAP7BBCMG5WY/

      Woke sacrifice, butter up the community works a treat.
      New Zealand’s richest person donates fishing boats, tractors and food to Tonga
      https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/127796079/new-zealands-richest-person-donates-fishing-boats-tractors-and-food-to-tonga

      The sad thing about NZ is that the majority of rich people born here seem to be asset strippers from the 1980’s or inherited their wealth, we don’t seem to be encouraging wealthy business who create and increase large high value NZ businesses and high value jobs… instead traditionally they create value from tightening up NZ wages, removing high paid jobs in NZ and profiteering.

      Then there are all the other ‘NZ’ developers joining forces with government figures.

      Stonewood Homes And Key Family Join Forces In $100M Capital Raising Venture
      https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/BU2202/S00298/stonewood-homes-and-key-family-join-forces-in-100m-capital-raising-venture.htm

      I’m sure these strategies will be winners for middle, working and poor NZ! (Sarcasm). They are already winning with record apartment and mansion prices!

      1. I presume Hart will leave his 9 homes recently purchased….empty.
        Seems to be the m.o of most wealthy…landbankers.

  4. Better be careful John, you’re coming dangerously close to showing sympathy for the homeless AND motel dwellers.

    Don’t you know these hateful, extreme-right racists are the minority and as such don’t matter?

  5. If all rental properties were owned freehold by their owners, then I think rents would probably be lower. The trouble is that too many landlords, who don’t have money to invest, or own freehold properties available for renting, are borrowing in order to get into the market; and that interest and mortgage payments generally are getting built into the rents that landlords charge.

    FOMO inspired greed seems rampant.

    1. That’s a good point mikesh – The Australian banks with their flexible credit limits are making big quids while our basic resources, in this case housing., become playthings on a monopoly board, on-line mobile version.
      And who loses out if there was a Savings and Loan USA bank flop? There has been granted here by our government, the right for all of our banks to dip into our savings accounts to help the bank keep afloat at a time of a bank run etc – I think. A link to that should be forthcoming but I have to get some other work done.

      https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sl-crisis.asp
      This is a summary of S&L USA.
      …Key to the S&L crisis was a mismatch of regulations to market conditions, speculation, moral hazard brought about by the combination of taxpayer guarantees along with deregulation, as well as outright corruption and fraud, and the implementation of greatly slackened and broadened lending standards that led desperate banks to take far too much risk balanced by far too little capital on hand.

Comments are closed.