Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

15 Comments

  1. If Greens are truly a Party that want to protect the environment they should consider going with National. I thought this would have been a goer in 2017 . I do not believe they have the backbone to,try this senario but with National running the purse strings and Greens the environment it could be a win win .
    I cannot see Marama excepting a union but Shaw might .

  2. David is just starting negotiations early, and for good reason, because once again National is looking soft when it comes to core liberal democratic principles.

    National’s pledge card doesn’t mention a thing about reversing Labour’s apartheid legislation, so voters need to clearly understand that only a vote for ACT will ensure that references to race are taken out of all legislation.

  3. Acts policy of allowing builders/developers to bypass council consents, we could end up with another leaky building syndrome. This policy would be a backward step we need to ensure we have processes in place to maintain high building standards and practices.

  4. If thats the way ACT want to play it, f%$k em, lets have a centre LAB/NAT coalition… Mr Trotter would have kittens.

  5. Personally I’d love the greens with National if they stuck to environment and climate issues. They would also need to be without Marama, Genter, Gori & Ricardo.

    Problem is their party set up will never allow it. Even though National have said they will make a Climate change ministry to help facilitate this.

    However, maybe this is a way to keep ACT in tow a little by National?

    Maybe Luxon is a little more intelligent than we think?

Comments are closed.