Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

22 Comments

  1. Well done Graeme! Not bad for a guy who started out as a tow trucker and panel beater.

    It just shows what can be done with some intelligence and effort.

    1. You neglected that Mr Hart got a few sweetheart deals along the way that set him on the path to prosperity. He did well to specialise in packaging & his decisions showed a long-term plan to build wealth so he has reaped the reward of his labor.
      I also know that you can’t take it with you & “What profit is it to gain the world yet lose your soul” so I am happy with my lot in life as I am sure he is also.

      1. It is clear reading the regular right wing contributors on this site that they sold their soles many years ago because for them life is only about the money. When they’re long dead no one will remember them.

  2. During peak COVID a person well known to me was a union organiser who dealt with an interesting situation involving Mr Hart. One of his other huge boats was in Auck for a refit and some regional boat builders shuffled staff around to do it. The company my friend dealt with had made workers initially use up their leave and holidays which was wrong to do in the wage subsidy regime, as a precedent setting successful case taken by Etū against Carter Holt Harvey on the same issue later showed.

    The company coughed up and paid back all its workers their leave. The quiet admission from the employer was that the Hart job was a windfall and had enabled that, when in reality the boss should have employed the spirit of the wage subsidy in the first place. Yay Graeme Hart!–not–he is a venal corporate thug. Thinking it is ok to have such a preposterous boat has to indicate some form of physcopathy. That yacht deserves a torpedo.

    1. So why is Hart the villain here .He gave a company some work in a period that was devoid of work .How the boss ran his business cannot come back on Hart

      1. To the likes of Hart, you are just as much an undeserving ‘bottom feeder’ as the people you hand out food parcels to.
        Don’t kid yourself that you are in their league, Trevor.
        Which brings me back again to why no-one has looked up the meaning of bottom feeder.
        Maybe Mr. Hart knows.

  3. The top 100 richest people want to pay more tax. They just don’t know how.

    Let them pay 45% not the squeezed middle.

    1. I’m sure the accountants and lawyers they hire to pay their taxes, could work it out if they wanted too.

  4. An interesting point you make about council rates being based on the property valuation.

    Wouldn’t it be much fairer for rates to be based on usage? Why should some widow 80 yo who bought a house 50 years ago be charged the same as the family of 5 living next door using 5 times the water, producing 5, times the rubbish etc?

Comments are closed.