Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

26 Comments

  1. A Guardian article on NZ has it that ‘NZ opposition leaders struggle for relevance.’

    1. Why the ‘nation’ saw retired Winston as relevant at all is a mystery. Why was he allowed to repeat lies that had been circulated by the right?
      Desperate measures by Newshub and Winston.

      1. It’s not a lie that Labour/Gov has been cosying up to gangs with the $200 “Koha” and the 2million grant to the mob or giving exemptions to gang leaders so they can keep their empires rolling along under the guise of suddenly being caring “essential workers”. it’s not a lie that gang numbers have nearly doubled and gun and knife crime has increased since hasty gun law and Labour softly softly no prison/short sentences/home detentions increase. Gangs have been breaking lockdown to keep drugs and money flowing from the franchises up to hq pad. Someone’s got to stand up to them. Long live Winnie.

        Lot’s of misplaced hostility to Winnie and misrepresentations of him as racist. It’s not racist to despise gangs and criminals. Some of the vitriol from so called lefties making as if he’s some kind of Nazi lol. For an antiwokeist MB sure makes himself their bedfellow in his hatred of Winnie. Labor lefties accused NZF of holding Labour back, but what have they substantially done this term without him to blame?. Winnie’s just the favoured whipping boy scapegoat of sellout pseudolefties …never mind the fact that he’s been the one to stand up against Nat’s turn to neoliberalism, against corporate corruption and neoliberal globalism as well as being responsible for the helping hand to the aged poor that is the Super Goldcard.

    2. Opposition parties have always “struggled for relevance” for obvious reasons. That aside, I’ve no idea why you think a highly partisan “news” outfit on the other side of the world has any great insight into our politics or that they’re worth sharing here.

  2. It is a serious situation re the border breach but I am delighted Winston has stumbled yet again, and this time with no parliamentary privilege. His use by date was when Muldoon died.

  3. This is typical Winston Peters.
    There’s a lot of anger here in Northland over the actions of this individual, the involvement of gangs or who (where seems a much bigger problem) her associates are is a bit of a side issue. Hopefully the truth will out. David Seymour has some questions lined up:

    “ACT will be submitting Parliamentary Questions to get to the truth about this Northland outbreak. Here are some initial questions that the Minister will have to answer within five working days from Monday:

    *Has Cabinet or the Minister for COVID-19 Response ever been briefed on the name, occupation, or criminal history of a person who tested positive for COVID-19 before?

    *Has Harry Tam ever had an exemption that would allow him to visit Northland from Auckland, in spite of an Alert Level boundary?

    *When did Govt learn the Northland case’s travel document was false?

    *What information led the Govt to believe case’s travel document was false?

    *Who provided the information that led the Govt to believe case’s travel document was false?

    *What new information was Minister referring to in 630pm press conference, that led to Cabinet convening?

    *What was the purpose of the travel pass issued to the Northland case?

    *What information was Cabinet given about the Northland case on and in the week leading up to Friday 8 October?

    *Did any officials attend Cabinet when it convened on Friday October 8, and if so who were they?

    1. It’s a pretty rotten sort of irony for people getting unceremoniously dumped into lvl 3 lockdown to see the government being so attentive to the privacy of the antisocial criminal and her associate that got them there, all thanks to the government’s error in giving her an exemption.

      Under these extraordinary circumstances it’s absurd to suppose that we, the locked-down, don’t deserve to know things that might help to preserve our health and communities. Winnie got one thing right: they know who the associate is. So why don’t we know? They could be anywhere, and likely infectious. The public needs to know. They stuffed it up, and it’s hard not to get the impression that the opacity surrounding the issue is more about saving face than public health or civil rights – a ‘nuh-uh’ to Winnie’s circus sideshow grandstanding just isn’t good enough. We heard about an ‘essential worker’ testing positive for days, when it was apparent that they knew the person was not, and there’s a credibility gap being created there where rumour and misinformation can fester.

      Are they trying to make David Seymour look good? This is a gift …

      1. Sorry but are you saying it was labour ministers that signed the exemption and not some official that looked at the paper work, which looked legit and said OK. Would like to know what the real process is.

  4. Winnie playing to his audience again. It’s time for the Police to release CCTV footage so as the accomplice can be located and arrested.

  5. Seymour grandstanding. As usual.

    I’ve been to the movie so can answer his questions easily.
    “I reject the premise of the member’s question.”

    Here is the news: As at Sunday 11.47 there is no “Northland outbreak.”

  6. Back in the day, when there was a proper media, no professional news provider would have dared publishing the sort of bullshit gossip Peters regularly regurgitates in his endless quest for relevance. Harry Tam should sue Peters and every alleged news source that recycled the old has-been’s drivel. Peters seems to have forgotten that he no longer has the parliamentary protection against defamation which has served him so well in the past.

  7. I could be wrong, But surely not even a professional could have that much sex?

    And aren’t there any sex workers in Northland?

    I suspect a completely different business model. Something beginning with P.

    But so what? We have bigger fish to fry. We are in a major public health emergency. Lives are at stake. And $billions in economic harm.

    These two women and all their contacts, should all be offered full immunity from prosecution and full gaurantee of privacy, in return for revealing themselves and their movements to the authorities.

    We are told that our covid scanning Ap is fully walled off to protect our privacy, it doesn’t care if we were doing something ilicity like going out to buy a tinny. The same with these two women’s travel data. In return for full disclosure of all their movements and contacts, full imunity from prosecution and full gauranteed privacy, the same for all their clients.

    How else are we going to cut off this possible underground chain of transmission?

    To get the informatin we need, What’s the alternative? Sleep deprivation, 24 hr interrogation until they crack, withholding food as well as sleep, water boarding or some other torture technique.

    Chris Trotter may be all in favour of using the stick. But we are better than that.

  8. Who are they going to drag out next week? Roger Douglas> Jenny Shipley? Richard Prebble?
    Getting John Key to opine about the economy and Winston Peters to give advice about racism, is like getting David Capill and Colin Craig to educate us about avoiding child sexual abuse.

Comments are closed.