When will cowardly ACT grow a spine on the cannabis referendum? When will David say sorry to Chloe?
Isn’t it depressing to see the once mighty freedom party – ACT, be so cowardly and spineless when it comes to cannabis reform?
Oh sure, ACT are all for free guns and no 1080, but sweet nothings when it comes to cannabis.
Is David Seymour going to officially apologise to Chloe Swarbrick for making her do all the heavy lifting for cannabis reform?
The reason that is given to ACTs spineless cannabis position is that the good people of Epsom don’t like cannabis and if David championed cannabis reform he would lose Epsom.
Which would be a problem if ACT were under 5%.
They aren’t.
Seeing as ACT are 7% (and heading to 10% thanks to Jacinda’s looming war against free speech) David doesn’t need Epsom to get into Parliament.
Look David, you’ve had your party hijacked by the NZ NRA and have lost your righteous ethical high ground because you are held hostage by the gun fetishists, isn’t now the perfect time to take some of that load from Chloe and actually start seriously supporting and promoting the cannabis referendum?
Wouldn’t it be nice to have some honour back?
Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice going into this pandemic and 2020 election – please donate here.
If you can’t contribute but want to help, please always feel free to share our blogs on social media.
Yes David, what about personal choice, just like your assisted dying referendum?
When you choose assisted dying you are killing yourself when you choose to get high you can kill someone else. David has said a number of times he will personally vote yes which is more than Jacinda has done.
But hang on mate – gun fetishists are all about killing as well! First they came for the thar but I wasn’t a deer ….. (apologies to Martin Niemöller).
And Trev, such is Arderns right to choose not to tell you, or are you advocating for not allowing personal choice and freedom.
I am not suggesting that but pointing out that the writer wants David to do something he does not ask Jacinda to do. Keeping choice and freedom is one reason I do not want a Labour Green government. I would rather see Labour rule on their own and listen to Greens on the enviroment .
Isn’t it funny that the biggest drug is power and both Judith and David are itching for it!
And you believe the crap coming from Collins or Seymours mouths? Come on Frankie, give yourself an uppercut!
So David is Pro Assisted Death Legislation and Anti Cannabis Legislation, WOW.
Up until the 1920’s Cannabis was one of the main ingredients in the manufacture of medicines, until the big Pharmaceutical companies got the product outlawed. The big Pharmaceutical Companies like Bayer and Monsanto etc have the ability to invoke legislation so they can increase their company’s profitability, these Multinational companies world wide have the ability to control Governments.
The Pharmaceutical Companies want natural medicines outlawed so they can push the synthetic medicines for higher prices which are protected by patents.
ACT: Just another Bourgeois Reactionary Party.