Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

5 Comments

  1. Yes agree but as usual we are at the tyranny of the majority and to make matters worse I see some of our people support this act at least according to last nights poll for Te Tai Hauauru. And this is a bit sad when both the candidates don’t support it. So I suggest they need to get out there and do some more mahi to inform our people.

  2. They should never have been put to referendum – both subjects are far too complex and emotive for rational assessment in the maybe 5 minutes of thought most voters will give the matters.
    That’s why Citizen Assemblies were invented – to have a randomly selected representative subsets of the population that could go into the matters in some detail and work through the issues and nuances and difficult balances required.

  3. Martyn, are you saying that the state would potentially treat the most needy and vulnerable with abandon regarding their lives, (euthanasia)? That seems like a mighty stretch to me.

    I do though wonder whether the pandemic has obscured the discussion of both referendums. How unfortunate it may be, if not clear, adulterated by fear, decisions are made .

  4. You should be drug tested for eligibility to vote in the cannabis referendum – non-users or those who have never used should NOT be allowed to vote as they have no idea what they are on about.
    The reality is that there is a portion of the population who would never use due to the legal status of the drug – many of these are likely to vote no – not due to informed choice, but due to misinformed claptrap that is expoused by the prohibitionists as fact.
    Obviously this is unrealistic but is food for thought. Remember voting yes does not compel one to use but it allows for choice and cessation of ongoing criminalisation of, usually, young maori males. This is another example of institutional racism and it is for this reason I have massive concerns that the yes vote will prevail.
    I really hope I am wrong.

Comments are closed.