Similar Posts

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

5 Comments

  1. “A University doesn’t have an obligation to shield staff and students from ideas that might trigger them”

    Maybe, maybe not Martyn but it IS a workplace and as such has a duty of care to staff & students alike

    If students themselves want to hold an event on campus grounds, you’d have a point. But why should that apply to EXTRERNAL GROUPS that have little connection to the University it self?? University management’s first duty of care is to the people who work & study there, not to others who feel entitled to use their spaces

    I fail to understand why that should be the case. Would you let white supreamists post whatever they want on TDB? I doubt that

    1. Can you please explain to us Mjolnir how a conference held by ‘outsiders’ during the term break when no staff or students would have been around would have been so triggering for the poor wee lambs?

  2. “This fiasco will end up empowering ACT….”

    Yup. I’m a lifelong Labour voter; but not next election. ACT will get my vote: at least Seymour understands what freedom of speech means.

    “Identity Politics would eat its own young if they weren’t all vegan.’

    Hahahaha! Nice: I wish I’d thought of that.