David Seymour’s latest school slop scandal tantrum

Firstly – How many Michelin Stars would that school lunch get?

Now, from David’s point of view, he’s saved the state shitloads of money by turning healthy school lunches into cheap slop that as far as he’s concerned shouldn’t be paid for by the State to begin with.

He’s Ebenezer Scrooge meets Milton Friedman, so he doesn’t care about this cheap slop as long as it’s out off the headlines, so his initial attack on the Principle who had brought media attention to this culinary voyage into food poisoning seemed predictable because this is just the latest example of how David Seymour has managed to take a wonderful school lunch policy and underfunded it so badly that those needing it learn to hate it.

When these failures keep getting reported to the Prime Minister he simply tells parents to make marmite sandwiches which is surprising because I didn’t realise how large the mocking hungry children electorate was.

David Seymour responded by attacking the principle for complaining to the media and notes that only 10 students have been ill and argues their illness could have been caused by anything other than his mouldy school lunches, which doesn’t feel like much a response.

His defence boils down to:

• This stupid principle keeps complaining about my shitty food
• Only 10 kids got sick
• You don’t even know if my mouldy food made them sick.

The Principle has responded to the defence that it was the dumb school’s fault for serving 3 day old food by showing the video footage of the company picking the meals and dropping them off which puts the blame on the company not the school.

The Company have said that’s wrong.

The kids are hungry.

David Seymour is better at twerking than feeding our kids, and he’s not very good at twerking.

Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.