You wont believe this new attack on Free Speech – UoA Greens cancel all debates if they can’t have trigger free safe spaces

53
2809

Wow.

I mean.

Wow.

Ok. How to explain what has happened without screaming.

That will be tough.

- Sponsor Promotion -

As you all know, I’m a Green voter and have been most of my life, but the middle class identity politics woke cultists who have taken over my Party are deciding on the most crazy bullshit.

The University of Auckland Greens have decided to cancel all political debates if they can’t be guaranteed trigger free safe spaces for them to debate in.

I know.

I know.

I know.

Here’s their bewildering capitulation…

… this is exactly the same woke bullshit that saw the Auckland Students Climate strike cancel themselves for being too racist!

Refusing to debate politics until they get trigger free safe spaces is such sheltered cowardice!

REMEMBER – this is the fucking University branch of the Greens, they should be championing free speech, not undermining it by refusing to engage because of some woke triggers!

Our planet is melting down, inequality and poverty are not being addressed and the University Greens won’t debate until they have an emotion support peacock present?

Isn’t it a tad convenient when James Shaw and Marama Davidson are politicians  bought off with vacant Ministerial baubles that the University Greens suddenly don’t want to debate?

How convenient.

There is an election year coming up and the University Greens are refusing to engage because they might be triggered by lies and hearing things that upset them.

Jesus wept.

This woke middle class nonsense that is infecting the entire protest movement is why the climate protest movement went from 170 000 on the streets to barely thousands 2 weeks ago.

The woke’s pure temple politics vs Broadchurch engagement is killing our movement.

Right now, teenage girls are risking death, beatings and imprisonment in Iran to fight for basic human rights. In NZ, a country far, far, far less authoritarian, the youth of NZ are too frightened to engage in political debate until they are assured it’s a safe space!

The Greens brittle shallow concerns are beneath the mana of the challenges in front of us.

Increasingly having independent opinion in a mainstream media environment which mostly echo one another has become more important than ever, so if you value having an independent voice – please donate here.

If you can’t contribute but want to help, please always feel free to share our blogs on social media

53 COMMENTS

  1. “Someday, when all your civilization and science are likewise swept away, your kind will pray for a man with a sword.”

  2. Maybe meetings should be held in ‘non-alcoholic’ towns rather than Auckland. I can see the debate formulating a remit about getting rid of the alcohol industry, (including the wine one of course) being a real cracker for this mob.

  3. Yes. This is blackmail and bullying from patently intellectually inadequate freaks who have the effrontery to regard themselves as politicians.

    The campuses used to be fountainheads of debate and dialogue, but this pathetic grouping may as well sod off back to the University of Waikato and sit around in deck chairs and feel sorry for themselves. They’re being used, but they are too dim to realise that.

  4. FFS If you won’t debate people with views you find offensive you can never challenge the people with those views to change them.

  5. – ‘Diverse’ means identity not thought
    – ‘Authentic’ means in agreement with Critical Theory
    Diverse voices are only authentic if they agree with doctrine, a non-woke minority individual does not have an authentic voice.

    This is political gatekeeping

    The Greens only want to debate on their terms. It’s not about excluding straight-white-cis-righthanded-neurotypical males (Stephen) it’s about establishing pretext for excluding anyone of any colour, gender or sexuality who does not agree with doctrine. It limits debate within the confines of the Green’s own ideological worldview while using minority identity as a human shield rhetorically.

    • Tui. Correct. And the university is under no obligation to succumb to these demands. In times past their premises were made available for meetings and gatherings under their own terms, which would-be attendants could either accept, or find themselves another location.

  6. When the Greens first came out, as it were.. they wanted air time, they wanted to be part of the national debate. They fought to have their voices heard.

    Now they’re acting like they’re the main attraction, as if they’re so popular they can demand a celebrity rider.

    Is it a case off; The Greens and The Cucks that Love Them.. OR, a collective sigh-of-relief from the adults in the room at escaping green narcissism?

  7. Debating is critical for democracy. It’s how adults achieve workable solutions for all citizens. The Green members are all great talkers, they need to back themselves and not resort to cancel people when they don’t get what they want. Keep in the dialogue people. At least a Blue/Green in Nelson with Nick Smith who won’t be beaten in a debate for all his other faults

  8. If this is the next generation of the Greens then the party is already dead. This is the most pathetic echo chamber creating garbage. It boils down to “We refuse to debate against anyone who doesn’t already agree with us 100 percent.”

  9. So these people are going to be at the vanguard for meaningful social, economic or cultural transformation?

    Ummmm. Ok.

  10. The Greens lost my vote when they recently wrote gender discrimination into their new leadership rules.
    Now we get the statement “Prioritising the safety of those at the margins of the community forms the core of our kaupapa”….really!?!
    For the last 30 years, here I was thinking the core driver for the Greens was the environment! Shows how gullible I am!
    The reality is, if the next generation of Greens are nothing more than a gaggle of authoritarian and angry snowflakes, so precious they refuse to engage in political debate, they will simply end up canceling the Green party from public representation.
    Never thought I’d say this but the way they are going, thats starting to sound like good thing.
    All that, at a time in history when we need a strong, vocal and persuasive sustainability/social justice party to challenge the status quo more than ever.
    Do us a favour Bomber and set up a party that is worth voting for at the next general election.

    • Sleek. I think we all know that beautiful Mother Earth could be euthanising herself right now, but the Green co-leader could still be exhorting,” A cunt ! A cunt ! My planet for a cunt !”

      The alternative gender co-leader will smirk like the kid who didn’t get caught in the cookie jar, half the rest will still be consumed with insane anger about what did or might happen to the sex lives of their whanau, others will be whizzing around on electric bikes or smoking joints in the jacuzzi, while down south, on an island in the middle of Otago Harbour, brainy Gareth Hughes thanks Gaia that he escaped intact, and unlike Kelvin, shows that some drops of Welsh blood can be life-enhancing, and mighty, and the stuff of legends.

  11. Good yes let us only debate with people who engage in “right think”.

    Utterly f…g intellectually bank rupt.

  12. I’m confused, Ardern and others proudly wore the headscarf in solidarity with Muslim women but now they don’t want the headscarf? Is it headscarf on or headscarf off in the safe space?

  13. What this group of Green uni students are doing has all the hallmarks of how a cult operates.

    People who fought for human rights and still do e.g the women of Iran, would think these kids are pathetic. What the hell has gone wrong

  14. Regardless of your politics you can’t tell me Chloe Swarbrick comes across as someone who can’t debate an issue. How are those that succeed them going to stand up in the house. It staggers me that they do this sort of thing.

  15. There’s nothing to stop these kids hiring a school or church hall. Churches are crying out for the extra cash and they could probably organise volunteers to mind them; the old ladies of St Barnabas, Fendalton, used to run a babysitting service as fundraiser, and there’ll be folk in Auckland who could do the same thing here. This’d give the Green kids freedom to do their own thing, and if they can’t stay sober, or if they get too histrionic or violent, the parishioners can call the cops.

  16. Jenny Shipley could pop down and look after them. I think she’s the one who wanted the drinking age lowered so that Kiwi yobs would morph into cool Parisian’s, or Spaniards drinking in haciendas with granny and the baby as the sun slowly sets over Mediterranean seas, or Italians on Vespas with gold chains like Indians’ gleaming in the moon. Where’s Jenny ? She may have free time in her hands.

  17. WtF does a trigger free safe space look like?Is it like an isolation tank where you wear ear plugs, a blind fold and just float? Wow

  18. Their idea of “debate” sounds a lot like that National Radio show that comes on in the afternoon where everyone sits around, smiles and agrees with each other.

    Host: Ooh look the government has some new marvelous idea. Do you think it’s marvelous?
    1st Guest: Oh yes. I think it’s a marvelous idea.
    2nd Guest: Well I think it’s more marvelous than you do.
    3rd Guest: Well I thought it was a marvelous idea before you guys ever did.

    Host: Well that’s just Marvelous. It must be a really marvelous idea. See everyone thinks it’s marvelous.

Comments are closed.