Changing The Lives Of Children With Offending Behaviour – Office of the Children’s Commissioner

0
37

Changing the lives of children with offending behaviour, and increasing the minimum age of criminal responsibility

Most 10-13-year old children with offending behaviour are well known to many government departments. Focussed interventions are possible and will pay dividends.

But a report released today by the Office of the Childrenโ€™s Commissioner identifies long standing deficiencies in our response to children who offend and makes plain that immediate improvements must take place.

โ€œMany New Zealanders wonโ€™t be aware that New Zealand has a specialised child offender system dealing with children who offend aged 10 โ€“ 13โ€, says Childrenโ€™s Commissioner Andrew Becroft.

โ€œThis system takes a welfare rather than a criminal justice approach. It looks at childrenโ€™s offending as something reflecting a context where parents and families donโ€™t have the support and resources to raise their children safely.โ€

- Sponsor Promotion -

But the report finds the system isnโ€™t working as intended. Too many children are not getting the kind of support that might stop their offending. Some become serious youth offenders as 14-17-year olds and are dealt with in the youth justice system. Some become adult criminals.

The report concludes that simplification and better resourcing enabling the system to support whฤnau in bringing about change in these childrenโ€™s lives is badly needed.

Another avenue for constructive reform is to raise the minimum age of criminal responsibility from 10 to 14.

โ€œThe current minimum age of criminal responsibility of 10 years old is far too lowโ€, the Commissioner says. โ€œThe minimum age of criminal responsibility should be 14, consistent with the recommendations from the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child.

โ€œMost children who offend come from backgrounds of trauma and disadvantage. A criminal response to their situation simply does not work. They should be dealt with by the child offender system reformed as described in this report.

In particular the report notes:

* The present system for children who offend is too complex and poorly understood
* Oranga Tamarikiโ€™s Services for Children and Families and its Youth Justice Services need to collaborate better
* Government and community agencies need to cooperate more effectively
* Effective early intervention in the lives of children and their whanau too often is missing
* Children with offending behaviour are too frequently disconnected from education
* Although most children in this cohort are Mฤori, the Office was repeatedly told that culturally appropriate responses from Oranga Tamariki were poor and need to improve
* Strategic leadership focussing on constructive improvement will lead to positive change for these children.

โ€œDespite much talk about reducing crime and prison numbers, itโ€™s ironic that a very effective long-term solution, a focus on reducing child offending, has not been prioritisedโ€, the Commissioner says. โ€œWe are missing a critical opportunity for constructive reform.โ€

โ€œAn effective and well-resourced system to work with children who offend and their families can do a much better job than the criminal justice system. It can provide many more options for dealing with children. It can also ensure parents and whฤnau have the necessary support to provide the care their children need.

โ€œIf we also raised the minimum age of criminal responsibility to14 we could be confident that we have perhaps the best possible response for children under 14 who offend.โ€