Similar Posts

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3 Comments

  1. The “investment approach” is based on flawed “evidence”, and misrepresentation of statistical data and some scientific findings is now the rule that the vested interest parties, including government, use to justify it:

    https://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/read-the-journal/all-issues/2010-2019/2015/vol-128-no-1425-20-november-2015/6729

    “Is the statement that if a person is off work for 70 days the chance of ever getting back to work is 35% justified?”

    Learn more about it:

    https://nzsocialjusticeblog2013.wordpress.com/2016/08/16/senior-scientist-and-legal-experts-discredit-evidence-used-by-msd-and-dr-bratt-when-claiming-the-health-benefits-of-work/

    ‚In the expectation of recovery’, Faulkner, Centre for Welfare Reform, Scrib
    https://www.scribd.com/doc/308613502/In-the-Expectation-of-Recovery
    (criticism of biopsychosocial model, Aylward et al)

    More about the lies we are presented:

    https://nzsocialjusticeblog2013.wordpress.com/2015/08/09/msd-and-dr-david-bratt-present-misleading-evidence-claiming-worklessness-causes-poor-health/

    https://nzsocialjusticeblog2013.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/msd-dr-bratt-present-misleading-evidence-on-worklessness-and-health-post-09-08-15.pdf

    Of course Bill Rosenberg has already revealed the truth about this ideologically driven nonsense:
    http://union.org.nz/sites/union.org.nz/files/Investment%20Approach%20is%20not%20an%20investment%20approach%20-%20Rosenberg_0.pdf

    Reply

  3. Sorry, but there seems to be no sound after about 17 minutes of this video, that is at least what I experience.

    Reply