Similar Posts

9 Comments

  1. 24 hours ago several high ranking National MPs including Simon was probably feeling pretty satisfied with themselves. Today one of them will be planning their retirement.

  2. I’m thinking you’re seriously overestimating the ability and competence of the GSCB.

    1. That begs the question: Is it possible to underestimate the ability and competence of the GCSB?

      1. To be a competitive cutting edge Windows Defender you really have to have your own military R&D unit. We have a procurement lobby instead that buys the latest technology instead of developing it ourselves. The GCSB is more like a decent security door with those flimsy wire mesh things covering the Windows. GCSB isn’t designed to do on the offensive. They’re mainly defensive.

  3. If the Police ask Simon Bridges who passed him the stolen goods, and Simon refuses to reply, then that probably counts as being an accomplice – by protecting the thief – and Simon could be charged. I think him more straightforward than either of his predecessors and the police should be grateful that it’s not John Key that they’re dealing with.

    I’ll check with my Nat neighbours, but as far as I know he’s still regarded as the best of a bad bunch as Nat leader. If he was deliberately set up from within his own party, that is sinister and scary, as it suggests someone who thinks that they’re above the law, and most criminals – according to the cops – are not as clever as they invariably think they are. Same with politicians.

    One nice thing about both Simon Bridges and Alfred Ngaro is that apparently they both get advice from their wives. They should listen to them.

  4. If, as improbable as it might be, it turns out to be foreign actors, (China maybe?), does that mean Simon Bridges has committed treason?

    Seriously, I’d love to know the legal ramifications of this…

  5. National party = dirty politics volume 2.

    A precurser to the 2020 election.

    Funny how Bridges saying national did everything right?

    Bridges complains that Robinson should front the media but it was National that stopped the labnbour plan to start a “free to air” channel where labour could always have their own media platform.

    So Bridges you cant have it both ways can you?

  6. All the commentators that have predicted Simon’s demise over the last few weeks have been proved wrong and he is still there. National is not like Labour with their constant change of leaders satisfying one faction but upsetting another until they stumble on a Helen or Jacinda who takes them to heady highs before they crash and burn

  7. WHO HACKED THE BUDGET ?

    Haven’t the Chinese been cosy with National for a very long time ? Buying MP’s , illegal donations , many many previous National Mp’s and cabinet Ministers in dubious joint business ventures ? Maybe now hacking Govt Departments to help their greedy planet raping buddies out ?

    If a link can be established , this may really undermine the not only Bridges but very seriously damage National’s integrity . Treason indeed , from the Chanational Party .

    In ancient England , Simon Bridges , wouldn’t just be resigning ,he ‘d be off to the tower of London to face his maker and the crows .

    Could be the best boost Labour ever gets .

Comments are closed.