Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

5 Comments

  1. Lesson should be that we shouldn’t or don’t need to allow Muslims into NZ – sure most will be totally fine but as European countries such as France / Germany etc clearly show some aren’t and then you have terrorists driving trucks down paths packed with pedestrians or stabbing babies in prams or even pressure from Muslim immigrants to ‘amend’ the culture of where they have chosen to live to adhere more closely to where they have chosen to leave from.
    Cue cliché cross-burning redneck vitriol . .

    1. Life tells me that secular and other religious people can be dangerous also so why don’t you push to exclude them as well? While I don’t recommend the Islamic faith it is not an indicator of any faults in the followers of it so you fit the description of a “cross-burning red neck” perfectly. If your idea of a perfect society is lots of people just like you it would end up being the most miserable place ever. The aftermath of the Christchurch terrorist event demonstrate that Muslims make a valuable contribution across many parts of society, I do believe that we should have control over any immigration however I can think of more important things to be concerned about than if they are Muslim.

    2. How many times did you jack off to the Christchurch mosque attack videos? Or is that number still rising?

      1. Sorry to burst your bubble but haven’t seen them / never would / don’t support in any way the terrorist attack in Chch.

        1. At least you have some redeeming features. I have no objections to dangerous people being restricted but blanket bans will inevitably lead to more blanket bans and then we might be next.

Comments are closed.