Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

12 Comments

    1. At least she (Jacinda) admitted there was a housing problem unlike Key he denied it for 9 years and then sold 1500 state home and introduced us to his new housing policy called motelcalefornia.

  1. At least she (Jacinda) admitted there was a housing problem unlike Key he denied it for 9 years and then sold 1500 state homes and introduced us to his new housing policy called motelcalefornia.

  2. Why should bad behaving tenants not be kicked out .They are bothersome neighbors to good tenants so why put the bad before the good .This seems to be a Labour problem of looking after the criminal not the victim.
    If I borrow money to start a business I can deduct the interest so why if my business is being a landlord should I not be able to claim interest on the mortgage.

    1. Trouble is Trevor, the landlords don’t want to pay tax on capital gains. Yes, a business can claim tax relief on interest when purchasing an asset. But, if the business sells an asset for more than its appreciated value then that business pays tax on the ‘profit’. Landlords want their cake and eat it too.

    2. In some places like Queensland, they had what’s known as move along laws. So police could go to gatherings of homeless people, and get them to move along. But they still have to be somewhere.
      Like Nacts policy of kicking unruly tenants out of state houses, is a very precise and understandable policy. And then putting them at the bottom of the emergency housing wait list, is also a precise and easily understandable policy. But after kicking them out, they still have to stay somewhere, and Nact policy at this point is not precise, and is not explained. Why doesn’t Nact also have a precise policy on where they will go, when kicked out. On the day they are kicked out. What’s their answer? Nact are good at the easy answers, but not the hard ones.
      Does anyone remember the number of tenants made homeless by the meth testing wild goose chase pseudo science evictions, under the last Nact dictatorship scorched earth social housing policy.

      There seems to be a pattern here. Nact has plenty of help for speculators and landlords who are their big donors, but is not so kind to tenants. And Nact want to reverse industrial relations laws and import cheap foreign workers to put downward pressure on wages, and increase unemployment.
      And finally Nact wants to get tough on beneficiaries along with building more gaols.
      Does any sane person really think these policies will NZ a better place, or a worse place. Apart from obviously the rich landlords, and rich developers, and the plain rich.

      This is not a fiscal hole in the Nact policys, it’s a logical commonsense hole. And needs a please explain.
      But since Nact want to look tough at all costs, to crack down on the gangs, of whom many came here from Australia during the last Nact govt, and now want to send raptor police into tangi gatherings, to take gang patches off mourning people, then commonsense is obviously in short supply.
      I would feel more comforatble if Mark Mitchel makes an election promise, that he will personally lead these teams of police into the tangi gatherings himself. He’s got the training. He can set the example.

      I’d not vote Nact simply because of their policy of resuming cruel live animal exports, let alone their other stuff. And anyone who wants a reminder of how utterly utterly utterly the economic record of Labour is, can see the evidence with this link (www.labour.org.nz/our-record).

  3. The Central government can buy damaged houses that are livable but unsuitable for ongoing insurance. Use them as state housing and if people have to be moved out eventually and the property abandoned. they will have had some years of reasonable living. Set up little groups nearby that can support each other in an emergency. They are available now so go for it.

    Also there should be an Official Co-ordinator with an overview who can put in a request to departments and agencies for houses and resources that are available, to enable an overall project. They could be snaffled or borrowed if not used, even when uncertain of exact use if would probably be within their requirements.

Comments are closed.