Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

32 Comments

  1. Jacinda promised transformative change in 2017

    And won 37% of the vote. The electorate’s appetite for Labour’s transformation wasn’t so strong. Whether it was Winston Peter’s handbrake, or Ardern’s pursuit of the centre, transformation got dialed back. Until Covid, Labour began to poll higher, registering in the low- to mid-forties, with government parties remaining over 50%. When the pandemic arrived, the lack of transformation made it easier for Labour to gather votes from a broken National Party.

    The path for Labour to retain power is to recover voters now flowing back to National. That means targeting voters more concerned about the price of a block of tasty cheese, not transformation.

  2. Exactly! Wellington city is a pro Labour/Green city since forever, hence to say public service are the problem is bit disingenious.

    Looking at Martin’s points:-

    Most were already promised by the current govt in some form, and none delivered.

    It starts and ends with ministers and their “yes minister” ministry – the nz version of emperor’s new clothes.

  3. Jacinda is Obama in terms of being all talk but a complete failure in practice, and Obama created Trump as a consequence.
    Labour is the political wing of the self serving public service though, it’s not a hundred day plan thing, it’s the fact their interests are not the best interests of the country.

    Labour are a hollow Trojan horse for Maori separatism and identity politics – the things the public service rely on for endless funding and need for more bureaucracy, but that actually tear this country apart.

  4. I agree Jacinda is our Obama love overseas not so much in NZ. When the history is written of her period in power in I believe it will say so much promised so little achieved . Compared to Clark she will not rate especially for the effect on the wellbeing of the poor .

  5. Martyn, that’s an excellent plan for the next time Labour are elected, which based on NZ political history will be in 2032. Between now and then I am sure Labour can announce some plans to announce consultations on proposed policy research – they seem to be very good at that.

  6. Let’s hope Greens (2 or 3 or 4 of them with principles), TPM and even TOP are preparing their bottom lines.
    From what I’m seeing and hearing, Labour could be in for a bloody big shock and it’s probably already too late for them to get their shit together.
    Danyl nailed it the other day with his Sunday Essay with TDB’s reference to it here:
    https://thedailyblog.co.nz/2022/08/30/a-self-serving-public-service-a-parliament-of-property-owners-land-of-the-wrong-white-crowd/
    He’s nailed what has changed within the ps (and political enablers) over the last 30 or so years.
    On that thread, I think I asked what is the way out of it.
    My reckons and thinkings in this space going forward are to vote the way MMP was intended – without all the spin and bullshit politicians would have us believe and listen to. That is to electorate vote for the most competent and possibly experienced candidate available, and to party vote for the party whose policies most closely align with yours. Spin and bullshit isn’t working anymore – we’re at peak PMC, peak egos, peak individualism, peak spin and bullshit.
    Trust of course is a big issue, but they’ve gone done it to themselves. If it takes another cycle or two for people to awoke, then so be it. The sooner the better

  7. The hilarity is that Labour wont and certainly Jacinda wont change a damn thing… the track record of Labour is essentially making things worse since the Lange govt. (If you dont count aspiration and virtue signals) I’m sure Jacinda will refute leaving those out.

    Yet somehow the likes of the author keep voting for them, defending them…

    What’s that saying about doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result?

    Theyll change next time, just one more term… honest…

  8. I always liked the snippy quip which was apparently set at the disadvantages of Big Government. When there was a hiatus in the upward movement in the USA space race someone said that they should have called the failed rocket The Civil Servant:
    ‘Won’t work and you can’t fire it’.

    It’s slightly amusing to have the same feeling now that privatisation has us by the throat with eager beavers rushing around setting up financing for their latest grande concretisation in projects (in French as it sounds grander than in English). In theory we don’t have to fire most as they are on shortish contracts. But they have still got us there as they might be recompensed if the contract is not rolled over for another term. But hey they are all generic anyway, so provided they know how to pick their teeth with both steel, wooden (and now greenl, bamboo) toothpicks we’ll get a fresh face on our smartphones toot sweet.

  9. In fact it’s Jacinda who has encouraged the creation of a flabby and incompetent civil service. Quotes from two recent articles:

    Newshub: “…when Labour came to power there were 339 communications staff working in public sector agencies. By 2021 this has climbed nearly 50% to 497. Similarly, the budget for government “spin”, had gone up from $33.8m in 2017 to $55.3m in 2021.”

    and

    “Labour’s spending on contractors and consultants has climbed to nearly $1bn a year, despite Labour coming to power suggesting that they would rein in this use of the private sector. Much of this is spent on the “Big Four” contractor firms – Deloitte, PwC, KPMG and Ernst and Young.”

    This is clearly a government on its last legs, scrambling to make stuff up on the fly and lying to voters in order to cover its tracks. All their policy initiatives have by now failed and several sectors are in real crisis: Health. Education. Crime and policing. Housing and homelessness. Economic. Race relations. Child welfare. All of which were perfectly predictable years ago because they are the result of their own policies – ‘own goals’ by this government.

  10. Labour are Master and Commander over the law and order ministries and by my reckoning have got exactly what they wanted. It’s just the consequences for the rest of us aren’t good as a result!

  11. Gosh Martyn, the National PR team are out in force this morning, all froth and distemper and not a single solution in sight. If you cruise the comments world you’ll see the same narrative espoused by numbers of anonymous individuals and after having found,on stuff, consecutive identical hate comments under different pseudonyms could I be forgiven in thinking that Bob the first, Krauty et al are not real people they’re just figments of imagination of comb over Dennis who sits in Hootens office?

  12. Don’t worry about all that, NZ now has more inclusive language like chest feeding and people with uterus.

    Pity that the inclusive language comes at the expense of cancelling out woman’s language and experience.

    Funny how nobody wants to be a midwife anymore!!!!!

    Government agencies don’t provide a real house in emergency housing, but apparently have people knocking down the door to teach you Te reo at 8am.

    Talk and virtue signalling is cheap and the main focus of wokesters! (Although cancelling others is even more of a priority).

    Real results like housing, quality jobs, health care, education, quick justice, are a lot harder to achieve and going backwards, fast.

  13. If Labour had given the wealthy tax cuts while raising GST for the poor. Turned Christchurch into a car park. sold off our generation and statehousing. Build a couple of conference centers. Flooded the country with migrants, tourists and students and then told us we had a rock star economy would you think they were competent.

  14. #11 Give Pharmac the $3,000,000,000 a year it needs to adequately operate as it was originally intended and meet the Oecd average of a minimum 10% of the health budget for medicines.

  15. oops That should have been #13 not # 11 re Pharmac funding.
    The pathetic minimal % increases a year has to stop.
    It is a major reason our hospitals are collapsing.

  16. Sorry Martyn you can’t compare Ardern to Obama. Ardern has it comparatively easy compared to being the first black president in a country with like the US. He probably burnt most of his capital on the Affordable Health Act which apparently made him a raving communist. Also he did not have both houses for very long did he (?) whereas second term Ardern has complete license to not be National with a tiny bit of empathy for more than the top 5%

Comments are closed.