Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

19 Comments

  1. Are you sure it wasn’t the Tax Payers Union painting over wasteful spending! How many hundreds of thousands in consulting fees and paint did it cost to paint a cycle lane pink? And why? For what benefit?

    1. Well my old mother-in-law was a dab hand with the paintbrush. Said there was nothing like a nice coat of white paint to freshen something up. Knitted and crocheted and spun her own fleece too, but gave new leases of life galore with her brushes.This wasn’t her though, she’s gone aloft.

  2. As an atheist I have little time for any religion, particularly the indoctrination of children before they have formed an independent world view–but–do not go around painting “you are all wasting your time” on Church buildings.

    Painting over the rainbow crossing was a pathetic act, akin to vandalising Jewish cemeteries. Libertarians are not that keen on alternative views and free speech when it comes down to it.

    1. Exactly.
      I find crucifixes and overt religious messaging highly offensive but don’t go around vandalising churches or ripping away someone’s crucifix necklace.

  3. I don’t understand this. Years ago when OU students painted footprints overnight, leading from the Post Office Savings Bank into a local pub, they were dry by morning. It can be cold in Dunedin, damn cold. Resene do a paint which dries at low temperatures and this sort of mess shouldn’t be happening. It could happen again. Best perhaps if councils rethink their own creative endeavours.

    Further, pedestrians on rainbow crossings are walking all over a significant emblem in a culturally or gender insensitive manner. Few tread softly.

    1. I’m sure Uganda awaits if you hate LGBT’s that much. Or maybe Ghana, Poland, Hungary or Russia. They are strung up from lamposts in those countries.

      50 years of socialism/communism in those countries and we still still couldnt beat those reactionary attitudes out of them.

      1. No no no. You do not understand. Again. Pedestrians walking on rainbow crossings need to tread softly, for they are treading on hopes and dreams.

        Walking over flags, or banners, or icons is discomforting, or even objectionable, and in some countries it is a heinous crime. So too a rainbow crossing is a symbol important to the rainbow community.

        Walking over it, at the very least, is supremely ironic. It soils it, and eventually erases it. Colourful helium balloons in the night sky could be rather nice, harder to attack, and ever so much less messy if they were.

        The OU students were much better planners. Timed for 2am, an army from Knox College, each armed with a template, swept into the Octagon, and before you could say,”Robbie Burns “, the deed was executed, neatly. The Aucklanders were clumsy and sloppy. If they just threw the paint down and made a big mess then they should face the full force of the law, one way or another.

  4. Their actions are as pointless as people gluing themself to the road to protest about trains & I imagine that only the paint/cleaning chemical suppliers will gain anything from their efforts.

    1. Not hospitals. They’re full of sick people and the religious ones are nearly all scared of going to hell and need those chapels to pray and plea bargain in. It might be easier to just get the army to shoot anyone they see in the vicinity of pedestrian crossings at night.

      1. Nah, in the hospitals as well. Remove them from all publicly owned property.
        They’re just designated safe-place sanctuaries, every bit as divisive. They even promote a nasty book that supports slavery and calls for the murdering of witches, adulterers and homosexuals .
        Do we really want to promote or tolerate that?

  5. Statistically I’d much sooner leave my kids in charge of a drag queen than a religious of any sort. I suspect many abusers choose the church simply because it gives them a certain authority over church members and a measure of trust which allows them latitude in abusive behaviour. I’m acquainted with a couple of people who were abused by priests in the past, whose parents punished them for telling the truth – simply because it was a priest.

  6. Will they get a Mulligan because there are church? That’s the main question in my mind. We know who did it, we know who encouraged it, and no better how much conservatives cheer them on, it is actually vandalism which puts people’s lives in danger. So will they be punished? I can’t wait.

Comments are closed.