Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

12 Comments

  1. Two of your pillars to economic salvation are not pillars at all.

    1- Changing the ownership of the stolen lands does not increase economic activity, it simply transfers the wealth off those properties, from one entity to another.

    2- Unless you set up expensive distribution channels for add on value to any export commodity, you are always at the mercy of the commodity recipient. Read milk, bottled water, logs, meat, etc. Value lives in the distribution, not the product. Example is Nestle versus Fonterra. Nestle has world wide distribution channels, Fonterra does not.

    1. Taking back the wealth from the people who stole the land
      and returning that wealth to the legal owners is great.
      And pay the interest acruing too.
      Sure is a wakaaro poutokomanawa for me.
      Hell yeah!

      1. To do that is easy, the crown simply natiopnalises all the territories and gives them back to the effected tribes. One hundred percent doable.

        As for interest? That is offset by the improved value of the land. Unless you want the land back as it was before colonisation and before the Maori wars. Again simply done remove any asset on the land, dig up the roads, rail, power lines, water reticulation pipes and pumps, etc.

        Another issue to confront is who “owns” the land. Varies tribes claim ownership and reading Keith Sinclair’s book “The Origins Of The Maori Wars” in regards land ownership around Waitara, is but an example of conflicting land ownership between tribes.

        The you have the issue of squatters on the land. Cant see many simply walking away. Who will enforce the eviction? I guess you put a lien on the properties that they can only be returned (not sold to anyone else) to tribal entities. Second round of land wars?

        We have the issue of the payment of “full and final settlements” from the crown to the tribes in the past. Will they be returned?

      2. The settlers made the land valuable by making it productive So how do you pretend nothing has changed since Cook landed.
        There are no full blooded Maori left so how do you work out how much each gets as recompense.
        It is great that the Maori language and culture is being promoted but we are a small Island and cannot afford to have duplicated arrangements for each sector of society. Each group should be treated with respect no matter the colour of their skin their religion or place of birth

    2. You could argue that the products produced makes a significant difference to the distribution channels, Nestle makes a huge range of products while Fonterra mostly supplies bulk commodities with milk powder being dominant. Farmers have talked for decades about getting more value added products to export but since it would require an income sacrifice now to invest they keep putting off any decisions for future generations, since the future generations are just as selfish nothing gets done.

  2. unions are the worst thing in this modern world. They are about outdated as coal mining.
    Lifting productivity would be the first thing we need to address.

  3. Why do we have a low wage economy, simple, a workplace where the majority of workers are gutless wonders, who would rather be on their knees, with the gutless, what can we do, simple grow a pair and form a UNION.

  4. “The Right to Strike: A 10 day nation wide national strike would achieve more for working people than a dozen elections. We don’t have the right to strike in this country for God’s sakes, stand on your feet or live on your knees!” Quite so. Since the Employment Contracts Act and Labour’s carbon copy of it, the union movement has never recovered. Most union officials have been willing to accept tight restrictions on strike action and workers have consequently suffered a decline in their fortunes.

Comments are closed.