Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

28 Comments

  1. a good win from Labour and Jacinda this time round

    and preferred , not because of anything outrageously ‘ transformative they’ve done but because i got sick of National – barking , dog whistling , smearing – was gross to see and a useless waste of time

    well b4 Covid hit they should have come out with good economic polcy , any policy but refused to , Simons obsession’s with Jacinda got in the way .

    nice of the Dalai Lama to offer his congrats but he needs to turn his attention back to his troubled nation and NZ needs to get on with it , the problems here aren’t getting any smaller .

    also a good charge leading up to this election from – TDB

    1. turn his attention back to his troubled nation

      ?? “His nation” was invaded and overrun, remember?
      (By the same lot who would take us too if we gave them half a chance.)

  2. Well Martyn, still no mention on your list of PERMACULTURE AND POWERDOWN, the only strategies that are going to make any real difference to emissions and to feeding the populace healthy food, as the global financial-economic system slowly (or quickly) collapses.

    Charles Hugh Smith has produced yet another outstanding article (he’s managing two or three outstanding articles a week at the moment!)

    ‘Whether we realize it or not, we’re responding with passive acceptance of oblivion.

    You’ve undoubtedly heard rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic as an analogy for the futility of approving policy tweaks to address systemic crises. I’ve used the Titanic as an analogy to explain the fragility of our financial system and the “glancing blow” of the pandemic:

    Why Our Financial System Is Like the Titanic (March 15, 2016)

    Coronavirus and the “Unsinkable” Titanic Analogy (January 29, 2020)

    But there’s a powerful analogy you haven’t heard before. To understand the analogy, we first need to recap the tragedy’s basic set-up.

    On April 14, 1912, the liner Titanic, considered unsinkable due to its watertight compartments, struck a glancing blow against a massive iceberg on that moonless, weirdly calm night. In the early hours of April 15, the great ship broke in half and sank, ending the lives of the majority of its passengers and crew.

    Of the 2,208 passengers and crew onboard, 1,503 perished and 705 survived. The lifeboats had a maximum capacity of 1,178, so some 475 people died unnecessarily. Passengers of the Titanic (wikipedia)

    The initial complacency of the passengers and crew after the collision is another source of analogies relating to humanity’s near-infinite capacity for denial.

    The class structure of the era was enforced by the authorities–the ship’s officers. As the situation grew visibly threatening, the First Class passengers were herded into the remaining lifeboats while the steerage/Third Class passengers–many of them immigrants–were mostly kept below decks. Officers were instructed to enforce this class hierarchy with their revolvers.

    Two-thirds of all passengers died, but the losses were not evenly distributed: 39% of First Class passengers perished, 58% of Second Class passengers lost their lives and 76% of Third Class passengers did not survive.

    Rudimentary calculations by the ship’s designer, who was on board to oversee the maiden voyage, revealed the truth to the officers: the ship would sink and there was no way to stop it. The ship was designed to survive four watertight compartments being compromised, and could likely stay afloat if five were opened to the sea, but not if six compartments were flooded. Water would inevitably spill over into adjacent compartments in a domino-like fashion until the ship sank.

    What did the authorities do with this knowledge? Stripped of niceties, they passively accepted oblivion as the outcome and devoted their resources to enforcing the class hierarchy and the era’s gender chivalry: 80% of male passengers perished, 25% of female passengers lost their lives.

    The loading of passengers into lifeboats was so poorly managed that only 60% of the lifeboat capacity was filled.

    What if the officers had boldly accepted the inevitability of the ship sinking early on and devised a plan to minimize the loss of life? It would not have takes any extraordinary leap of creativity to organize the crew and passenger volunteers to strip the ship of everything that floated–wooden deck chairs, etc.–and lash them together into rafts. Given the calm seas that night and the freezing water, just keeping people above water would have been enough.

    Rather than promote the absurd charade that the ship was fine, just fine, when time was of the essence, the authorities could have rounded up the women and children and filled every seat on lifeboats.

    Of the 1,030 people who could not be placed in a lifeboat, 890 were crew members, including about 25 women. The crew members were almost all in the prime of life. If anyone could survive several hours on a partially-submerged raft, it would have been the crew. (The first rescue ship arrived about two hours after the Titanic sank.)

    Would this hurried effort to save everyone on board have succeeded? At a minimum, it would have saved an additional 475 souls via a careful loading of the lifeboats to capacity, and if the makeshift rafts had offered any meaningful flotation at all, many more lives would have been saved.

    Rather than devote resources to maintaining the pretense of safety and order, what if the ship’s leaders had focused their response around answering a simple question: what was needed for people to survive a freezing night once the lifeboats were filled and the ship sank?

    I think you see the analogy to the present. Our leadership, such as it is, is devoting resources to maintaining the absurd pretense that everything will magically re-set to September 2019 if we just print enough money and bail out the financial Aristocracy.

    Whether we realize it or not, we’re responding with passive acceptance of oblivion. The economy and social order were precariously fragile before the pandemic, and now the fragilities are unraveling. We need to start thinking beyond pretense and PR.’

    And so it has been with the Adern government -all pretence and PR, and no substance (National being the same but worse, of course.)

    So here we are, as passengers on the ‘NZ Titanic’, with the captain and crew refusing to accept that the ship is sinkable (and indeed already taking on massive amounts of water) and insisting we continue on the course that has got us into so much trouble, i.e. rampant consumerism, and industrialism in general, whilst kowtowing to banks, corporations and opportunists.

    All we can say is, it’s just as bad or worse throughout most of the world.

    http://charleshughsmith.blogspot.com/2020/10/the-titanic-analogy-you-havent-heard.html

    1. AFKTT I find solace in much of your comments. To add further to the Titanic analogy, that cruise liner sunk because the bulkheads did not go fully to the top, in other words, they cut corners in the design and build processes. This allowed the spill over from one compartment to the next. The forward compartments flooded, spilling over to the adjacent compartments, the bow sunk, the stern raised high out of the water until the super structure broke in half and sank into the murky depths of the Atlantic.
      If the Titanic is neo liberalism, with all its design flaws, and the belief it is unsinkable (too big to fail), and the bow and stern represents the great divide of inequality, we are seeing the neo Liberal Titanic take on too much water (debt), to stay afloat, not enough life rafts (bailouts) to save everyone, not enough buoyancy (resources) to keep it afloat and the stern sinking (financial crisis/stockmarket crash) and the bow rises up out of the ocean (civil unrest, riots, uprisings) and the whole thing snap in half (for example, civil war in America) and the entire system sunk with few survivors.

  3. Congratulations to all those Labour and Green supporters . I hope for all of you and the whole country that the support and trust you put into Jacinda and her party come to fruition .

  4. Congratulations to the politicians who won and those who also fought for what they believed in. Interestingly the left success comes with a virtually closed off border which shows the influence that was being exerted on NZ democracy via ‘NZ” media and paid for campaigns (if the $100k ‘donations” for list MP seats in Natz, and free overseas trips for Mayors giving out resource consents and selling off council assets, was not enough to work out that there was strong influences at work).

  5. Jacinda and Labour seem to have found a happy spot for Kiwi’s (which Chris Trotter astutely describes as “Jacinda will keep us moving to the same place”).

    Yes the same place could be better but when NZ politicians seem to go for massive transformative changes things go wrong for Kiwi’s (Rogernomics followed by Bill & John’s low wage economy) so maybe nearly 50% of voters now just want to vote to stay where they are, not actually be worse off that easily happens when a politician goes in a radical direction in NZ.

  6. Final thoughts on the 100 days.

    Nothing for the environment.

    Some of these ‘wish lists” seem more like an echo chambers of woke such as allowing illegal immigrants an amnesty. Yep this illegal immigrant just killed a baby, https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/revealed-social-worker-downgrades-cyfs-response-weeks-before-baby-royal-killed-by-surender-mehrok-in-tauranga/KVZIXNAAATWICCPUDST67GSQIU/ but the woke are more interested in his rights! Crazy!

    We deserve decent people to settle in NZ to create a safe environment here for all. We also need to spend our energy on those criminals already in NZ that need rehabilitation and housing and jobs, not a tick box culture to increase criminal demand, led by exploiters, that seems to be encouraging the worst types to come to NZ and then we can’t get them out again.

  7. Or just demand some real socialism – such as the development of a clean green democratic worker coop sector using government loans with a target of it being 50% of the economy by 2030.

    1. Matt the govt supported growth of an economy largely based on local cooperatives scares shit out of many but IS the way forward.
      Government support and incentives along with development of cooperative networks will strengthen economies at local, regional and national level.

      https://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2013/jul/06/international-day-of-cooperatives

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKbukSeZ29o

      40% of business in xxx in Italian Emilia-Romagna province.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urCy3UOGgx8

      Cooperative networks make capitalism look sick.

      The Govt also must take stronger control over banks and become the lender of first choice as well as use sovereign money to fund its programmes.
      Our Public Health system is in deep shit and needs to become a part of the government ministries with full funding and direct public accountability.

  8. None of that will happen. Ardern will not want to upset the large numbers of former National voters who have gifted her a majority. She will straddle the middle hoping to hold onto those voters for the next few elections. Unfortunately for her National will rise again and we on the left will be in a similar position to Nationals current calamity. It’s just how it works in NZ, the tide comes in and out. So I say use your majority now before it inevitably disappears, she won’t though. Labour is bedded to neoliberalism and incrementalism and if you are all honest, you know it too. Another term of National lite…

    1. Sadly, I agree. The Greens might be unprofessional and have potty mouth, but I’m sure they would at least try and do something about the Housing crisis and Poverty and all the rest. Not so Labour and National. It’s just dumb and dumber.

  9. National will only rise again if they rid themselves of the dirty politics style, the horrid internal fighting, power at all costs and arrogance. The world has changed from that style of politics and we will see this again at the upcoming USA elections, that I have no doubt.

    1. They will rise again no matter what. Ardern is currently just the flavour of the month. Let’s face it she hasn’t won this through policy delivery.

      1. And what did Key divery in his first 3 years Mickey? And are you saying he was only reelected because of the Christchurch earthquake?

Comments are closed.