Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

21 Comments

  1. Very unfair on us as Māori we all have whanau in gangs so we will be tarred by association, and this has the potential to be abused. This will also get peoples backs up and cause more social problems with the burden failing on innocent whanau. It’s bad enough we get targeted I have experienced this firsthand, and boy do I get angry when they do ethnic profiling.

  2. Very unfair on us as Māori we all have whanau in gangs so we will be tarred by association, and this has the potential to be abused. This will also get peoples backs up and cause more social problems with the burden failing on innocent whanau. It’s bad enough we get targeted I have experienced this firsthand, and boy do I get angry when they do ethnic profiling.

    1. I get pulled over about once every two months, large brown male with tattoos driving a nice clean ute…

  3. There were a few reasons for Labour losing the election but one of them was their softly softly handling of the gangs . Their power and mana needs to be lowered so they do not appeal to young people .
    The whole reason why the gangs are popular needs serious work over the long term. Input needs to be sourced from Maori leaders as so many of them make up the gangs

  4. There were a few reasons for Labour losing the election but one of them was their softly softly handling of the gangs . Their power and mana needs to be lowered so they do not appeal to young people .
    The whole reason why the gangs are popular needs serious work over the long term. Input needs to be sourced from Maori leaders as so many of them make up the gangs

  5. This legislation is ridiculous. It doesn’t do anything tangible to deal with the real causes of crime. It is akin to medieval sumptuary laws, which banned certain groups of people from wearing certain clothing on the basis of occupation, restricting access to certain fabrics, and later, as in contemporary Europe, banning Muslim women from wearing hijabs, or prescribing ‘correct socialist haircuts” in North Korea, or banning drag as occurred in the United States during the fifties.

  6. What if every one adopts a new fashion of having similar decals like the patches so popular with some people. Would the police go around arresting us? That would be fun providing there is lawyers handy.

  7. When Judith Collins, the gangs, the Free Speech Union and TDB all agree, the legislation must be bad. Who will they come for next? It might not be you or me this week, but the precedent set with this legislation is outrageous.

  8. So… here’s what’s happening, the police want to be able to use the “sighting” of a gang patch to broaden their availability of search warrants, and while a suspect is detained, they will be able to confiscate any gang paraphernalia e.g. gang patches, without risk to the “arresting” officers. The police will then be able to tell Mark Mitchell they are upholding his ridiculous pogrom. Then the lawyers of the slighted gang will then challenge this in court, due to the fact that gang members do not own the patches they wear, because they are issued by the gang, and that the police have in fact taken something that does not belong to the gang member. Thus clogging the courts with retrieval petitions from the gang. Sounds to me like this is going to cost the tax payer a fortune.

    1. Spot on.
      The police, once spotting a suspected ‘ gang ‘ symbol will also have to waste time perusing through a huge catalogue of pictures of legally banned insignia. Then on with the paperwork of issuing a notice , to offender , then fill in the incident diary and report form.
      Meanwhile, the neighbour who wears no noticeable ‘ gang ‘ insignia , carries on incognito with his laundering business,
      ‘doordashing ‘ as a courier night and day.
      Abracadabra !

      1. Yes, if I were a smart criminal participant in organised crime and connected to overseas drug or other cartels, I wouldn’t be sporting insignia which drew attention to myself. But then again, most criminals – and politicians – aren’t as clever as they think they are.

  9. Gang patches are recruitment advertising and for ‘intimidation’ just like a lot of other uniforms. Would the police rather crims self identify with patches or be inconspicuous like triads blending in with community or white collars hiding in plain sight?

    If the criteria is red or blue clothing then David Seymour will need to be wary the next elected woke government doesn’t designate pink and yellow to be gang colors.

  10. “ The police don’t do the bidding of politicians” ? Well at the Parliamentary Precinct Demonstration, the politicians, aka Trevor Mallard, aka Parliamentary Services, over-ruled the police’s request to turn off the sprinklers which were simplistically intended to drive the protestors away without listening to what they had to say. Whatever the rights or wrongs of the protestors, they did have the right to speak, just as those women seeking voices in Albert Park had a right to speak, and on both occasions the state was complicit in shutting them up. That looks like a bit of an overreach to me.

    The outcome of the politicians’ stupidity at the Parliamentary grounds occupation impacted not just upon local Wellingtonians and their businesses, but throughout the country, including cops drafted in from elsewhere, families dislocated and covid infected and officers injured, while all the main political parties, all of them, were as useless as each other, watching safely from the balcony, and unified in protecting themselves, courtesy of those very same police.

    What now ? Defund the police and replace them with social workers ? Underpay them encouraging them to emigrate after our hard-earned tax dollars have been spent training them, and some Minister bleating away that one day they might come back again ? What about their whanau and social communities?

    Interestingly, Gale Garnett, talented 60’s pop singer who wrote and performed the iconic , “ We’ll sing in the sunshine… and then be on our way…” was a New Zealand-born girl who maybe epitomises our contemporary political arena, but probably with more working brain cells than most of the bottom warmers in the Beehive appear to have.

    How

  11. I will register the national party as a gang because it is led by a skin head gang leader .As for profiling maori as being responsable for all crime check out the photo on stuff of the fella who robbed a dairy with a large knife .Whites black power bloke ive ever seen ,but no doubt the cops will be too busy looking for a brown fella instead .
    My daughter works in corrections and says the gang fellas are the most respectful to her ,adressing her as MISS while the white fellas are abusive arrogant arseholes .

  12. I will register the national party as a gang because it is led by a skin head gang leader .As for profiling maori as being responsable for all crime check out the photo on stuff of the fella who robbed a dairy with a large knife .Whites black power bloke ive ever seen ,but no doubt the cops will be too busy looking for a brown fella instead .
    My daughter works in corrections and says the gang fellas are the most respectful to her ,adressing her as MISS while the white fellas are abusive arrogant arseholes .

  13. “Snatch the patch” will be a debacle. I am supporting gangs on this on the basis of freedom of speech, expression and association.

  14. It’s a simple. The government has no business telling people what they may and may not wear. As long as it’s not nothing I guess. We don’t want to frighten the horses do we.

Comments are closed.