Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

8 Comments

  1. It doesn’t have to be an ‘either’ ‘or’ scenario, why not have both? Seventy-four million isn’t a huge amount, less than a third of the money spent on immigrant John Key’s wasted flag referendum, when changing the New Zealand flag was the only legacy which he seemed to care about leaving.

    Truancy is a complex issue. Our children are our future. Any money spent on their well-being and getting them into classrooms is money well spent. A Commissioner for Children would be an excellent idea too.

    1. Good comments .Education is the main tool society has to break the poverty cycle. We are a small wealthy country that could attract the best teachers from all over the world to pass on their knowledge to our children .We would then attract businesses that need those brains and pay good wages for them . Higher wages high tax take better for the people a true win win.

      1. Trevor. We need a different, more innovative approach, eg something like Queen Camilla has initiated in the UK, focused on child literacy, rather than just on getting kids into schools. Unfortunately it’s unlikely to come from the hapless Education Department, seemingly more influenced by Jan Logie type philosophy rather than what education is meant to be about. Even a skills-focused approach could be a useful sort of compromise, but just the sight of the plonkers from the Education Review Office makes this seem an unrealistic expectation. Once again, it is the children who miss out, and the country missing out with potential talent wasted.

        Everyone’s also forgetting the assault on psyches by the pandemic and lockdowns, and insecurities at every level, except for the clueless privileged politicians, protected and buffered on every side.

  2. Well, this is great. That’s extra jobs, 740 truancy officers with $100,000 salaries and the kids will be back in school and it will save the jobs of the many teachers who would become unemployed if truancy remained at the currently appalling rates of 20-40%.

    Healthy school lunches, do that too.

  3. Isn’t there something awry with the sentence “Imagine if we spent $74 million on free school lunches” ?

Comments are closed.