Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

7 Comments

  1. The very idea of a second Trump Presidency is so terrible to the present administration that they’ll prefer WW3 to it.

    1. That’s probably the point. There’s no way Putin will use nukes when his mate is about to get back in.

  2. We are ahead of the USA we have had our Trump and his troop of ferrals for a year already .They have done nothing constructive and are about to do their best to destroy NZ ,BOTH AS A SOCIETY AND ECONOMY .

  3. Great quote for this piece title! Note: I want to be able to know whose image or what location the image shows. Could we have that option? By pressing or moving over image or so?

  4. The battle between two ‘wolves’ is inside us all.
    One is evil. It is anger, envy, jealousy, sorrow, regret, greed, arrogance, self-pity, guilt, resentment, inferiority, lies, false pride, superiority and ego.
    The other is good. It is: joy, peace, love, hope, serenity, humility, kindness, benevolence, empathy, generosity, truth, compassion and faith.
    “Which wolf wins?” “The one you feed.”

    1. One you nurture and control, one you tame and encourage Pavlovian-wise. Otherwise it is a battle of two halves. The approach would be to understand that simple violent reaction to stimulus would not solve problems and bring uproar, but to pause and think could bring salvation.

  5. There are solutions to the problem of majoritarianism. The first depends on a sense of moral obligation to others (which traditionally came from the Gospel via various religious movements and churches). The second depends on an objective understanding of how society functions (that is a knowledge of political economy which goes beyond the banalities of neo-liberal ideology). When one or both these conditions are met the voters will make decisions which are “better” in both the moral and practical sense of the word.
    The church leaders who criticized the Treaty Principles Bill know that duplicity, breach of promise and betrayal will never end well for the guilty ones. On the other side the 42 King’s Counsel and Dame Jenny Shipley understand the importance of a collaborative or at least quiescent Maori population to the survival of the colonialist regime. But there is a section of the political establishment, and a corresponding section of the public, who fail to understand either the practical or moral dangers of the TPB. “Fools rush in where angels fear to tread” as the saying goes. This risk-taking is indicative of a systemic failure of neo-liberal secular society. If the morally and intellectually deficient element of New Zealand society become politically dominant, whether or not in “the majority”, the colonialist regime will be in trouble.
    Looking further into the future, the real-time accountability of rangatiratanga will be an effective check upon the excesses and abuses that are an inherent possibility in the zero-sum game of Westminster politics. The cry of “We won, you lost, eat that”, to quote the immortal words of Sir Michael Cullen, will be relegated to history. Government will become more stable, moderate and responsible.

Comments are closed.