Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

24 Comments

  1. Speaking of a compliant media ( understatement I know) …. these ‘reporters’…businesspeople and cricketers heading off on a jaunt on a taxpayer-funded Airforce plane with the PM …do they have to contribute to costs ? If so, how much ?

    Serious question .

    1. Junkets are so common now that the word is seldom used.
      If you are with the right crowd there actually are such things as free lunches.

  2. How can we have a reduction in suicide rates when Jonathan Coleman’s answer is laying a false claim of increased spending into mental health AND he won’t will not answer any questions on it! In most situations we call that a dictatorship!
    Another minister set to join Hekia.

  3. We can only document the crimes. We have no agency to prevent them. It’s very much like Rome in the fourth century.

    Gaia will deal with the perpetrators fairly soon: living outside the bounds of ecological sustainability only works for a very short time.

    Crunch time will almost certainly be around 2020, and it will be more-or-less all over around 2030.

    https://scripps.ucsd.edu/programs/keelingcurve/wp-content/plugins/sio-bluemoon/graphs/co2_800k.png

    Unfortunately a lot of innocent people are going to suffer horribly and die as a consequence of the actions of the greedy few. However, it has always been that way through human history.

    Some say our species is fatally flawed, and there is much evidence to support that contention. It is certainly true of Homo colossus -industrial man. We know the answers but refuse to implement them.

  4. The NZ media and in reference to the NZ Herald has become over-satuated with what I will call the John Key Mutual Admiration Society sorts of journalists. Perfect examples are Claire Trevett, Audrey Young and John Roughan. It’s like the NZ Herald cannot question let alone criticise Key and co. And such bias by the NZ Herald towards National and Key are becoming obviousl as time goes by.
    Here is the hyprocrisy that is rampant in the Key government. They want to fool every NZer into believing in the Planet Key doctrine that all is well. The “nothing to see… move along please….”
    If we ever do see John Key doing a fund raising like sleeping on a street without his Obama-like security detail encamped around him for even one night then I am sure we would be in shock. But the Key government doesn’t give to others without expecting something bigger in return albeit a GST increase in return for a votw due to Key hedging on a promise that he will break asap once the votes have been counted.
    This government has failed abysmally to provide anything for the best interest of NZers and NZ. Instead this government sleeps with whomever provides it with the money to the National Party.
    When a government purely exists for the purpose of bribery then it isn’t a government for the people and voted by the people. It is a government that sells off whatever/where-ever to the hghest bidder eg the Chinese ‘property’ investor who happens to donate heavily to the National Party.

  5. The toxic state of Lake Forsyth deserves to be an international disgrace – bluegreen but not pure. A competent government would priorotise cleaning it up, because it is desirable to develop the capacity to mitigate this kind of environmental hazard. For the screamingly incompetent ninnies who have left Christchurch in ruins it is, of course, not a priority.

  6. Is it ok for me to ask you to learn to use an apostrophe correctly? Or even…gasp…how to spell?

  7. You forgot to have this article proof-read. Or edited. Is it too much to ask that you learn to spell or use an apostrophe? You lost me.

  8. Selfishness, solipsism, greed, ignorance and narrow mindedness are not gendered. Economic inequality is ultimately not gendered, it’s a class and ethnicity division. (Men get paid more mostly because they work more- fact, the oft quoted emotive stats are misleading, though the argument can be made that roles traditionally dominated by women are underpaid- but we have a system that rewards greed and selfishness remember) – Some good points made, shame about the rather hand wavy references to “toxic masculinity”, a debatable sideline irrelevant to the central theme of the article, which is economic fascism and political hegemony.

  9. Most Excellent summation Martyn, but we must change the national government at the next election, or else there will be nothing left to fight for, it’s a chance we must all take. We must not let John key have his way.

  10. +100 Great Post!…this should be on the front pages of our mainstream media…and on RNZ…but of course it is NOT!

  11. Yes, this National government have been awful.
    But wouldn’t the same list apply to the last Labour government?
    And would Andrew Little’s policies solve those issues?

    The answer to the first question is yes. The answer to the second question is no.

    We need a Labour Party to oppose National, not reinforce them.

    1. “National government has been awful”

      Is that it? Bloody hell, that is a flaming understatement of monumental proportions, and you have given yourself away with that one Fatty.

      Besides, you don’t know that and your assumptions could very well turn out to be wrong. You are part of the problem Fatty. You would rather National stay in power, rather than give the opposition a chance. You obviously don’t give a shit about this country or it’s people, you would rather NZ was completely destroyed and foreign owned, and you will get that wish if John key stays in power.

      1. “You obviously don’t give a shit about this country or it’s people, you would rather NZ was completely destroyed and foreign owned, and you will get that wish if John key stays in power”

        Lol.

        Your emotive scaremongering won’t work on me. Conservative neoliberal nationalism ain’t my thing. I prefer left-wing solutions.

          1. Why don’t you try to discredit my argument instead of making baseless personal attacks on my political beliefs?

            You avoid my point that these problems existed under Labour from 1999-2008, and Little’s policies won’t solve them.

            Labour has to do better than present themselves as a slightly more palatable version of National. That doesn’t motivate me (and others on the far left), it fails to motivate the Labour base (no election momentum), and swing voters will stick with the devil they know (it’ll lose the election). It’s basic strategy.

            Scaremongering with UKIP rhetoric about NZ being destroyed and foreign owned is a waste of time. It’s not an election winner because it delivers National-lite policies.

            What’s worse is that leaders like Little reinforce neoliberalism – just like Helen Clark did. I make no apologies for critiquing Labour-neoliberals. But you can keep apologising for neoliberalism if it makes you feel better

          2. What argument is that ? that you would rather have National remain in power becasue they were “awful” rather than take a chance with the opposition becasue they are not up to that perfect high standard that you want ?

          3. Simplistic binarism is boring. We don’t have FPP, we have MMP. I think having Labour in Govt could mean a change if Labour had limited power.

            For example, Lab 25%, Greens 20% and Mana 6%.

            But if it’s Labour and NZ first, with the Greens tacked on the end, then we’re looking at an ideological approach that is similar to Theresa May’s Conservatives (conservative neoliberal nationalism).

            If the best argument you can come up with for Labour is that it’s not National, then good luck convincing swing voters. And good luck ending neoliberalism, lol.

            As I said, try to show where I’m wrong about Labour. You can’t

  12. The fact that we have a PM that epitomizes those ten points and is entirely responsible and couldn’t give a shit doesn’t seem to get thru to many in this country that it is corrupt because theve never understood what corruption is

  13. Yes those bastards have taken over most so-called democratic countries, and the result is that the poorest and the weakest suffer the most.

Comments are closed.