Similar Posts

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

8 Comments

  1. What about a gofundme for the homeowners: “Show compassion to [Insert name] who has dropped a $200k deposit on a 2 bed do-up drainage ditch and now faces negative equity. Please give generously to [Insert name]”?

    1. No. There is no reason usurious banksters should be paid by donors, there is no reason they should be paid by anyone.

  2. So every man woman and child paid $450 in exported bank profits. Why isn’t it part of the reserve bank governors mandate to stop this from occurring?

  3. One of the advantages of having a state owned bank is that it can offer cheaper mortgages to stressed borrowers, even if it is not in its economic interest to do so.

    1. However I can’t see this awful government agreeing to that since it would probably create problems for the Australian banks.

  4. Protecting first home buyers is subsidising property investors in the same way that accommodation supplements subsidise property investors.
    Sometimes you need to make a sacrifice for the greater good, and the sacrifice is not a whole generation of first home buyers, it is a portion of privileged first home buyers likely financed into ownership b the bank of mum and dad.
    They will be fine. It is the people who work and want a home but can’t afford one, and renters who are held to ransom by unscrupulous landlords, that you should be concerned about.
    And until house prices fall by at least 50% from current levels, or even better 70%, these young people are destined to head offshore to a country that offers more than wolverine tears.