Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

5 Comments

  1. While any plan to tax the wealthy is good they usually control the government and other NGO’s so any increased tax income is likely to be frittered away with needless schemes and excessive salaries/consultant fees so those under pressure receive little to actually help them.

  2. This is all very good in theory. Lets collect a billion dollars, a hundred billion, hell lets
    make it a trillion. Then what. Name one government or one international organization
    that we could trust to actually address the problems that face us and help the people
    who need help.
    ignoring the rest of the world, I wouldn’t give our current government one more cent
    that I already have to. What are they going to do. continue to shit all over the poor, over
    Maori, ignore the sick, the homeless. Fuck them because they will just find new ways to
    channel it back to their rich donars.

  3. Bryce Edwards strikes me as a perceptive political commentator – although his link to the ivory tower may troublesome. The fact that The Platform publishes his work is perhaps more troublesome.
    https://theplatform.kiwi/opinions/the-2025-nbr-rich-list-once-again-shows-who-runs-this-country

    In a recent piece he argues the Rich List tellingly reveals economic priorities: to quote, “property development and investment dominate, with multiple fortunes built on what economists recognise as classic rent-seeking behaviour – extracting wealth through ownership and monopoly rather than through productive innovation or adding real value”.

    Now if Mr Edwards is correct – and few would argue against him – that’s where the trouble lies. Not with wealth in itself – although the accumulation of wealth is usually associated with exploitation of some kind – but with the way wealth is now created, and by extension the favourable regulations that allow this to happen – if property investment and associated tax regulations in NZ are anything to go by, rent-seeking behaviour is in fact actively encouraged.

    If the wealthy are required to drive the economy, as we are repeatedly told, how do we encourage productive innovation and the addition of real value? And, for good measure, discourage predatory rent-seeking behaviour and withdraw the privilege of monopolies.

  4. What infuriates me is that we have done this before and it works.
    We taxed wealth. The sky did not fall. The rich did not flee taking their wealth with them.
    ‘During World War I, revenue from income tax increased greatly, becoming the largest source of tax, in place of customs duties. But, still only 12,000 people of an adult population of 700,000 earned above the £300 threshold and were taxed. The top rate was 43.75% in 1921. Tax rates were lowered in the 1920s and in 1930 the top income tax rate was set to 29.25%, and the threshold lowered to £260 of annual income.[7] By 1939, and before World War II, the top rate was 42.9%. During the war, there were huge rises in the top rate, taking it to 90%. It dropped to 76.5 percent by the end of the 1940s. The working class still paid little or no income tax.[8] The top rate was 60% in 1982, until Robert Muldoon’s National Government raised it to 66% that year.[9]
    The Fourth Labour Government, with David Lange as prime minister and Roger Douglas as finance minister, introduced a goods and services tax in 1986 and then reduced the top income tax rate from 66% to 48% in 1988 and then 33% in 1989.[10] The Fifth Labour Government raised it to 39%[11] in 2000. It was cut again by John Key’s National government, and again a 39% rate was reintroduced by the Labour government in 2022.
    Goldsmith Paul Te Ara: The Encyclopedia of New Zealand
    https://www.nzae.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/NZAE-Calculating-Average-Marginal-Tax-Rates-for-NZ-1907-2009.pdf New Zealand Association of Economists Annual Conference. 16 June 2011.
    Please note that Paul Goldsmith, present National Party Cabinet Minister is the historian forced to acknowledge New Zealand’s prosperity during the years of high taxation.
    Recording the truth but not putting it into practice.

  5. Bloody GST on repairs and maintenance on my old house so it can go for another 50? years and I have to pay a tax on that to the government, inflationary and poor system of tax gathering. We should have an 0.5% Financial transactions tax. People come here and think everyday should be Christmas for them. It was a a dirty deal from Labour. When I was in Switzerland in the 70’s I think they had 15% GST and I feel that we became so pretentious that we thought that following the Swiss was a recipe for making the spongers rise, and they were right in that. I didn’t understand how our agricultural economy worked until a Chinese tutor cautioned us at a course I took. We have been as ignorant as the German people emotionally wound up that gathered in tight lines and helmets in front of Hitler.

Comments are closed.