Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

6 Comments

  1. Bridges or no Bridges, burned Bridges, or no burned Bridges:

    Conclusion:

    The actual True Blue Right, i.e. harder core, want a HARD line, which only Judith Collins will deliver, but her wider appeal is limited, she is also not that much liked by many in caucus.

    Once she puts the dagger in, and Bridges has to step down from his leadership role, the HARD right will rule again.

    That may appeal to some property owning, business operating and culturally ‘conservative’ folks, it will turn many liberal minded urban voters off, including those who used to vote Labour under Helen, then deserted her in 2008.

    With present Labour being more talk about ‘change’, they are simply nothing more or less than a moderator of the neoliberal state of affairs, and will kowtow to business, including famers walking a tight rope balance, as usual. There will be some kinder gestures to the poor, perhaps a few tiny lollies to beneficiaries, but for the most, they will manage the country aith the likes of a John Key Light diet of policy.

    Jacinda appeals, goes on the social soft skill side of things, and people voter for her, not so much for policy, more for personality as they did with Key.

    Hence the more liberal Nat voters of 2008 to 2014 come back to Labour and ensure Labour carries into a second term, ensuring being in government, but doing only very little of what they campaigned on prior to the election in 2017.

    That is also why they have all these ‘expert’ consultation groups. Some consultation is always needed, but what we will get is a delay tactic, to have reports tell the government, to do only little in the way of changes, so to not upset the system that is in place all too much.

    Can we be happy? Nope, I am not, it is a shallow mellow crap business to me, and appealing to the urban liberal consumerists, combustion engine motorists, and wasters and life-stylers, all wanting to carry on as usual will spell disaster for this country in the medium to longer term.

  2. Simon Bridghes; “he’s done enough social damage to prove he can be leader of the National Party.”

    Yes he certainly qualifies for that prized position of being another ‘national carpetbagger’ – alright he is.

  3. Neither Bridges or Collins have the natural cunning and aggressiveness of a Rob Muldoon, nor the smarmyness of a John Key.

    They will be out in the wilderness for their term of 40 years.

    Thank goodness.

    1. Judith Collins is the iron fist in the irradiated titanium war gauntlet. There is nothing soft, compassionate, sympathetic or warm about Judith. She’s concentrated venom with a dash of hydrochloric acid for good measure. If National want someone who will gleefully trample the broken bodies of the coalition into the mud, cackling like a demented harpy all the while, then they can’t go past Judith. She’s about as approachable as a flaming cactus, but she’s clever and ruthless.

      On a positive note, she’ll probably reduce what’s left of National’s reputation to ash and dust into the bargain.

Comments are closed.