Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

6 Comments

  1. A sad tale. A late friend knew him well and told of a deeply troubled and troubling character, definitely a flawed individual. My friend refused offers to be at Jerusalem because it was a flawed idea by a flawed man at a flawed time.

    I have no real appreciation of poetry, who knows what genius and value there is in his works. What I do know is that whatever was there yesterday is the same today, it is cast in letters on paper.

    There is no exoneration for Baxter, his crimes live on with his victims. That said, what is new we did not know before? What can be gained from fresh outrage?

  2. I met him once – he was a friend of my parents, a brilliant poet I have no doubt of that but a deeply flawed man and ultimately a bastard to some vulnerable woman.

  3. “upon the upland road
    Ride easy, stranger:
    surrender to the sky
    your heart of anger”

    How does one separate the brilliance of the poet from the nature of the man?

    1. Andyw: “How does one separate the brilliance of the poet from the nature of the man?”

      I wonder if we need to. Baxter isn’t the first notable to be found to have had feet of clay. And I’m sure that he won’t be the last.

      However. As you say, he was a brilliant poet; let’s just pay attention to that, and leave his past to lie where it is. In any event, nothing can now be done to ameliorate his misdeeds.

Comments are closed.