Similar Posts

8 Comments

  1. Who would want to lead that loathsome bunch of self serving entitled pricks?

    Maggie Barry pretty much sums up a National MP and that’s a positive.

    The unusual election result meant the losing party, National, did not clear out anywhere near the dead wood it should have. Troughers like Barry, Brownlee, Tolley, Smith, Bennett, Collins and others with out of control egos should have split the programme before last Christmas. They didn’t, all believing that they are entitled to remain to resume their rightful places asap! And that causes problems.

    Bridges is toast, the clock ticking momentarily upset by the rather rouge TV1 poll, hence the leaks, using multiple burner phones according to Barry Soper, such is the water torture hit job Bridges faces. The heel dragging walk out yesterday by his clearly indifferent caucus was truly embarrassing.

    But National are going to struggle and if ILG and or others don’t fuck up any further, their problem remains. Too many tired, horrible personalities lingering without the money, influence and bare faced natural duplicity Key brought to the job to keep them in line.

    Couldn’t happen to a nicer bunch!

    1. “Maggie Barry pretty much sums up a National MP and that’s a positive.”

      Well yes, to the extent of self service and self entitlement in attitude.
      But then can you imagine what Baggie Marry thinks of Paula Bennett when she’s so judgemental over someone dressed like something out of the Great Gadsby.
      You could just about line them up in two queues
      The culched Barry and Tolley and Finlayson and Wodehouse [single o] et al
      in one, and the Bennetts and Bridges and Mitchells et al in the other.

      Fuck knows what you’s do with a Collins though. Maybe there should be a third queue

      1. I hope Judith rolls Simon. The amount of entertainment Collins as leader of the nats is guaranteed to be endless.

    1. Trouble is it’ll never be truly over. The nats will come back at some point, whether it’s another John Key or Labour loses its mojo again. I hope it’s over for the nats, too, but the best we can hope for is out of commission for a long time.

  2. So the number one suspect is still Judith Collins, and her henchman, Cameron Slater.

    The txting is Slater’s modus operandi. Let’s not forget how he used txting with Key — https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zealand/john-key-admits-texting-cameron-slater-6175836

    If Bridges wants to preserve his leadership, he needs to remove Collins from any front bench of his caucus and demote her to the bottom ranking. But he won’t because he is in utter fear of Collins’ wrath and the viciousness of Cameron Slater.

    Remembrr what Slater and Collins said to each other; “always give back double” — https://www.interest.co.nz/news/71717/judith-collins-resigns-after-revelation-slater-email-saying-she-was-gunning-feeley

    1. It just shows how two-faced Collins really is when she’s seen to be hanging out with Slater.
      How that guy isn’t in jail defies belief.
      He’s on record as stating in an television interview that he never breaks the law.
      Really?
      In 2009 he was charged with nine counts of breaching name-suppression orders and one count of identifying a victim in a sex case on his blog.
      Convicted on 8 counts, ordered to pay $750 for each count of name suppression and court costs of $130, adding up to $6130.
      He was back in court in 2016 for breaching an undertaking not to publish information about an Auckland man. Made to pay $1500 for being in contempt of court and also to pay 60% of the complainant’s court costs which amounted to $11,000.
      That makes him a convicted criminal, yet he is allowed to continue operating his ‘blog’.
      I want to know why he is allowed back on the internet (the place where he committed his crimes) and why he’s still allowed access to a computer.

Comments are closed.