Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

7 Comments

  1. Voter turnout in US politics has always been frighteningly low. Indeed, it’s been steadfastly below half the eligible voters for as long as the country has existed:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout_in_the_United_States_presidential_elections#/media/File:U.S._Vote_for_President_as_Population_Share.png
    The notion that the US is the “greatest” and “strongest” democracy in the world, or even a “healthy” one, is an abject lie. Any country where voter turnout is materially under 50% is usually considered failing.
    Anyway, Moore’s documentary is at best preaching to the converted, and at worst it is a bit of a muddled mess intended to manipulate viewers to his political leanings with all the subtlety of a sledge hammer (which generally has the opposite effect BTW).

  2. “Documentarian Michael Moore revealed this week that he made efforts to help Hillary Clinton (who he called “the smartest person to ever run for president”) by enlisting Amy Schumer, Chris Rock, and Bill Maher “to form a Justice League of satire and comedy” to take down Trump with jokes during the 2016 presidential debates—an effort the Clinton campaign rejected.”

    Poor Michael Moore, he’s made some great documentaries, but if he thinks Hillary Clinton regurgitating Bill Maher jokes is a cunning plan it just goes to show that there is some tragic and inexplicable disconnect between his exposes on American poverty and disenfranchisement and the reality of peoples suffering and rejection/disinterest in Corporate Democrats.

    https://www.esquire.com/entertainment/movies/a23336311/michael-moore-hillary-clinton-comedy-writers-fahrenheit-11-9/

  3. Fahrenheit 11/9 was an absolute flop! Perhaps one of Michael Moore’s biggest when compared to the money invested producing the film and revenue generated.

    I hesitate to call it a documentary, as it strikes me more as propaganda from a man [Michael Moore] that lost his objectivity a long time ago. Michael Moore was certainly a Clinton shill building up the the 2016 election – that is UNDENIABLE~!!

    Michael Moore has become a neo-propagandist, now known omissions rather than poignant observations.

    That’s my critique!

  4. Of course, a low turnout of those who suffer the most, is always intended, hence so much BS campaigning only focusing on some middle class and rich voters. Others feel it is a waste of time to be heard. The funding regime does serve the better off, as it is the rich and powerful who have the money to support candidates.

    Dumbing down and discouraging the most disadvantaged and suppressed is part of the agenda, it is more and more taking place also in Aotearoa Shit Sleepy Hobbit NZ Inc..

  5. You could not have expressed this viewpoint better. What a catastrophe. Someone pointed out that both Trump and Sanders had loyalists getting tattoo’s but Clinton didn’t… Meaning that it was one guy or the other that voters were passionate about, Clinton was too entitled, corrupt and old order. The enduring image of the last election for me was Obama patting Sanders on the upper back as he walked him down the outside of the Whitehouse as if to say you aint up to it old boy. Wow how wrong he was…how patronising that image is. Legacy? What legacy. What a waste Obama turned out to be, for the good guy he apparently is supposed to be. But, howzthat? Can’t get to grips with that idea, at all.

Comments are closed.