Similar Posts

6 Comments

  1. At least, they have not yet found a way to paywall laughter! Today, my face hurts – I’ve got muscles there that I’d forgotten existed. (What a great way to look towards the next decade or so.)

    Cheers! 🙂 🙂 🙂

  2. In defence of Duncan Garner. Garner supported Sue Bradford’s anti-smacking bill and wrote why he did so.

    He, me, Helen Clark and bad John Key are the only persons I know to have publicly supported what Sue Bradford was doing. All the violent family in which I grew up were and are anti Bradford.

  3. Unfortunately for you Martyn, the Herald’s paywall was implemented by underpaid chimps, so all its glorious opinionators are still discoverable with a little workaround/ CSS jiggery pokery

  4. There should be an award for the whoever among the media are most in lock-step with the Nat’s Dirty Political Tricks.

    Here are two main Nasty Political Tricks they played:
    1. When the Coalition released their 2019 Budget, complete with certain Social Welfare Reform measures, the Nats pre-empted any in-depth discussion of it by their own early release. The media then allowed questions about a possible government site hacking to overshadow discussion of the budget itself. This meant that down the track it is easier for Nats to claim, “They’ve done nothing”.

    2. Secondly the Nats found someone who had been in an eight month relationship with a Labour staffer and who then made certain complaints about him. Paula, empowered by some in the media, used this to begin whipping up a frenzied series of attacks on Jacinda. Again, the political timing was a factor. The attacks took place at a time when our PM was being held in considerable esteem by others around the world. For example, while she was speaking at the United Nations Bryce Edwards was effectively smearing her on the Guardian, with suggestions that she was “embroiled in a sex scandal”.

    1. Kheala – ‘For example, while she was speaking at the United Nations Bryce Edwards was effectively smearing her on the Guardian, with suggestions that she was “embroiled in a sex scandal”.’

      I think this is indefensible from a so-called academic. But OU staff are said to be subject to odd constrictions restrictions now.

      Even if readers are later made aware of the truth of an issue, the negative effect of the initial accusation often still lingers, and as a political scientist Edwards would, or should, know this.

      He’s not the only NZ commentator publishing distortions in off-shore media – the pay is quite good, and if they can malign the govt, then it’s a double whammy for them.

      Bennett’s sex attacks on PM Ardern could back fire – one doesn’t have to be a psychiatrist to figure out
      why she’s so interested in it, but the interplay with media shows how successful the marriage between PM Key’s office and Whale Oil was, and that yes, it’s business as usual with their lazy dirty progeny.

Comments are closed.