Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

35 Comments

  1. Never have I been so happy to be wrong. This is indeed a stunning result. I will openly admit i had mistakenly picked Peeni Henare to win, mainly on the basis that the Labour Party threw everything they had including the kitchen sink to ensure Peeni Henare’s victory.

  2. This is a lesson to Labour. They need to have some actual policies, and they should be pro-human policies rather than slightly less bad than National. Nor will ‘we’re slightly less racist against Maori than National’ do the job.

    1. Yeah!!! This is why he lost. Watch out for general election if the dumb fuckers carry on just swinging their dicks in the breeze like they have been doing under Chippy since their monumental loss at the last election.

  3. The message is that Maori are not going away .The colonist parties need to sit up and take note .The down side is the colonists will now move heavan and earth to remove the Maori seats asap .

  4. The people of Tamaki Makaurau have lost confidence in the colonialist system of government. That is why 80% of those registered to vote chose not to vote.
    Those who did vote wanted a radical alternative to the National/Labour duopoly. That is why two thirds of them voted for Te Pati Maori.
    Nothing stunning. No bombshell.
    What comes next?

  5. This result shows that having a powerful election machine is not enough to win elections anymore.
    Voters voted for Te Pati Maori because of their policies.

    Tim Selwyn’ criticisms of Oriini on the capaign trail tell me one thing. Oriini Kaipara is not a politician.
    And people saw that.

    I reject Tim Selwyn’s criticisms of Oriini Kaipa, The worth of an MP is not judged by how well they did on the campaign trail as a huckster for votes, but how they perform in parliament.

    I celebrate Oriini Kaipara’s win, I expect great things of her in parliament.

    Tēnā koe e hoa.

    1. What is the worth of an MP? As you would know Pat there have been many members elected to the British parliament who never intended or were not allowed to take up their seats. Those members are perhaps the only ones who have not in some way disappointed the hopes of their constituents.
      The real question in the minds of the public is not about the worth of individual members of parliament, but about the worth of parliament itself. Oriini Kaipara, by her actions in parliament, may assuage or confirm that doubt. She is most unlikely to remove it entirely.

  6. I am really looking forward to Oriini Kaipara’s maiden speech in parliament.
    Efeso Collins maiden speech in parliament moves me to tears every time I watch it.
    I expect Oriini’s maiden speech to be as great.
    In his maiden speech Efeso Collins touched on many of the things that are close to Maori. The theft and denigration of Samoan language and culture in common with the theft and denigration of Maori language and culture by the colonial system, especially the education system.
    Efeso Collins began his maiden speech with a greeting in Maori and spent at least half of his speech speaking in his native Samoan, which he admitted struggling with, due to the colonial education system that robbed him of his ability to speak to in Samoan to his wider family and community. And which he had to relearn.
    Efeso Collins closed out his speech with further words in Maori.
    The public gallery was packed out by members of Samoan community who sang a waiata that rang through the house.
    I expect Oriini Kaipara’s maiden speech to be as memorable and inspirational, an event and celebration of Maori culture and history as Efeso Collin’s maiden speech was a inspirational and memorable celebration of Samoan culture in this country.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRy3y9DqyGM

  7. My hope is that The Daily Blog can livestream Oriini Kaipara’s maiden speech in parliament.

    1. I do wish your comparison is right and could come true but it feels like wishful thinking in dreamland. Effeso was beyond exceptional and no one in parliament comes near him. A great loss and no amount of wanting her to measure up to him can make it happen. Unfortunately.

  8. Te Pati Māori has a lock on the Māori electorates for at least a decade. In 2026, they will win all seven.
    It is likely Te Pati Maori will get at least 3% in the general election, perhaps as much as 5%. It means a likely overhang with between 121 to 124 seats in Parliament. That obviously favours the Left bloc of Labour/Greens/Te Pati Māori.
    I think the next election will be close. There is likely to be some economic uplift which will help the coalition.
    My major concern is that in these times too many big issues are in permanent contest. There is not enough consensus on the big multidecade issues. This has become a much bigger problem in the last 10 years.
    From 1996 to 2017, there was significantly more consensus. Not so much in the last 3 terms of parliament, with a much greater tendency to ascribe bad motives to the other side.
    So long as that tendency persists, New Zealand will not do so well. Australia will continue appeal to many more New Zealanders, right across the socio/economic/ethnic spectrum.

    1. TPM are the only serious party in parliament with any pro-human policies. Why waste a vote on the vacuous Green weirdos? Or the completely unprincipled neolibs of Labour?

  9. 27% voter turnout I heard. Can’t really build a commentary around that other than to suggest lack of interest in the byelection so close to the big event.

  10. The Maori show they do not want Labour and in 2026 Pakeha will show they don’t want them either.

    1. This will be the last National coalition for many years. Not one person of any color will want National, ACT nor NZ First, such is the damage and economic destruction they have imposed on New Zealand. New Zealand is now a land of immigrants as record numbers of kiwis have left to live in Australia where wages are high, the weather great and their government are pro their citizens.

      1. Things are not all beer and skittles in Australia especially if you rent or lose your job.As most NZ citizens are children of migrants then them leaving is no great surprise . Labour is a lost cause and while I cannot stand Winston especially his race baiting he will grow .

    2. nothing worse than limp cucumber on stale bread. Thankfully our youth are a lot more maori and polynesian adjacent than their dim-witted parents.

  11. Sorry, Pat, but she comes across as a light weight – in all senses. Everything she has said and in particular the breezy, dreamy, glib, way she says it tells me she has no idea how to achieve any of it. What activism etc has she been involved in? – all I know is she reads autocue. Will be very happy to be proven wrong and as a politician her presentational ability means she is already half way there. The voters clearly adore her, and the two university polling booths is evidence of strong youth support probably replicated across the electorate.

    Voter expectation is of rhetoric because they appreciate they have little power in this parliament, so I don’t think they expect solid policy the way I would, or the commenters here would. Flowery, wooly speeches and responses are in these circumstances acceptable and even endearing to the electorate obviously. There are Belfast constituencies won by Sein Fein where their elected members boycott Westminster and never take up their seats, so in a colonial context this is not an unusual stance. However… if it becomes likely your decolonialist party will be part of the next government the expectations might change from aspirational slogans to what will you do?

    Is it right to equate the two candidates as relative support for their respective parties? Yes, yes it is. But the actual vote will be split to get an overhang, people will be hip to that scenario. So there will continue to arise a disconnect between the opinion polling and how those voters will end up casting their party vote.

    27% turnout? I’m going off the Electoral Commission and what they posted up as final to get 21.4%, but even 27% would still be the lowest I can think of.

    1. “There are Belfast constituencies won by Sein Fein where their elected members boycott Westminster and never take up their seats, so in a colonial context this is not an unusual stance. However… if it becomes likely your decolonialist party will be part of the next government the expectations might change from aspirational slogans to what will you do?”
      This is the nub of the problem, and the most realistic answer is that Te Pati Maori could go the way of its previous iteration, the Maori Party.
      This is a fundamental political question which should not be overshadowed by personal judgements on Oriini Kaipara or any other individual politician.
      Pat’s enthusiasm for Oriini appears premature. Tim’s criticism likewise. In any case, what is to be gained by such trenchant attacks? “If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door”. It may be better to reserve our judgement for now at least.

  12. Firstly I dont agree with many of the comments, only 27% of eligible voters voted,why because them voting isn’t going to change anything yet and many are struggling with the costs of living. As Peeni is already in some saw this as an opportunity to get another Maori candidate in parliament. I said this before and will say it again TePati Maori will win all the Maori seats accept Ikaroa Rawhiti,Cushla will retain her seat. However the majority of Maori voters will give Labour their party vote hoping they can work together for the greater good, and that includes the Greens. Labour need to focus on the party vote and they need some good policy to get those voters who believed in the bullshit slogans and promises that were never gonna be delivered not with the current weak PM we have. National will be asking for a mandate to privatize much of our public sector now I doubt many NZers will be able to stomach this. But Labour needs to reverse a lot of the damage done and this won’t be easy.

  13. My neighbours who are Maori also have English, French, German, Indian and Chinese ancestry. No doubt others as well. They acknowledge and respect their parents, grandparents and great-grandparents who came from among other peoples and other cultures. Like all Maori communities, ours is inclusive because it has to be. But it is Maori. Maoritanga is the centripetal force which keeps the hapu and hapori together. It is the glue which cements together those whose whanau names may be English, French, Indian or Maori. The marae and the kura are welcoming and inclusive, but they are monocultural (I hesitate to use that word because of its connotations, but there you go). If you tried to make either of those institutions “multicultural” you would get short shrift. People would be perplexed. They would probably shake their heads and walk away.
    I believe that this is what happened when Labour tried to introduce the idea of multiculturalism into the Tamaki Makaurau by-election. It was seen as intrusive rather than inclusive. Takuta Ferris would not have been the only one to react in the way that he did. The Maori seats in parliament are Maori seats. They are not multicultural seats. Trying to make them multicultural is naturally perceived as a threat to their essential character.
    To put it simply, Labour’s multicultural intervention was a mistake which betrayed a surprising and woeful lack of political nous.
    There is a bigger aspect to this. Maoritanga is not just the force that holds Maori hapu and hapori together. It is all that there is to hold Aotearoa as a whole together. Therefore Maoritanga can do what multiculturalism can not. It is the only possible basis of kotahitanga amongst our peoples as a whole, just as it is on the marae and in the kura. I would not expect Labour to agree with me on that. Not now. It is too soon for that. But the time will come when they will see what should be obvious to them already.

Comments are closed.