Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

13 Comments

  1. It would be a lot easier for the government to slowly change the members of the Tribunal so that there was more community buy in. Perception (even if wrong) is the the Tribunal comprises leftist activists.

  2. I rather think that John’s submission will have the opposite effect to what he may have intended. References to “resentful, lazy, red-neck racism”, “a grievance culture amongst Pākeha”, and “Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels” will put a lot of backs up.
    John’s submission does not really explain itself, and has no positive alternative to offer. We need to do better than that.

    1. Binders full of women: The existing judge-defined “principles of the Treaty” are well-intentioned and politically rational, yet they are still a construct built around the Treaty rather than an interpretation of it.
      On the other hand David Seymour’s proposed principles are not well-intentioned, they are not rational, and they are not well constructed.
      Therefore I agree, along with some eminent legal opinion, that the focus of our discussion should revert to the actual articles of te Tiriti, and we should give little credence to those who fantasize about its “principles”.

  3. How can the government draft a Bill on the treaty without consulting Maori? It’s like David flying off for an Atlas meeting without telling his partner.

  4. here are the facts towards all the treaty breeches.

    http://www.nwo.org.nz

    The principals bills sole purpose is to override any Maori rights and to minimize any substantial redress of those breeches and allow the corporate takeover of New Zealand with minimal opposition.

Comments are closed.