Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

9 Comments

  1. Well, that’s interesting. I had no idea that the NZ Health Service considers they have adequate protections against gay conversion therapy.

    Most of the opposition to these bills, currently sweeping around the western world, are objections to tagging banning “gender identity therapy” onto bills banning gay conversion therapy. They make it seem like the 2 things are the same, and they are not.

    Proposed bans on “gender identity therapy” generally aim to only accept a “affirmative” approach to anyone who says their gender identity does not match the “gender they were assigned at birth”.

    A gay man explains why this is a problem:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYboWXveGM8

    And Kiwi ex-pat Holly Lawford Smith, now at a Melbourne Uni, explains in more detail, the problems with such Bills – it’s now law in Victoria in Aussie. The Victoria Act, actually is homophobic, because it has changed the definition of gay/lesbian, from same-sex attracted, to same gender attracted (whatever that means, but could include males who claim to be women, are attracted to women, and are thus lesbians).

    https://www.feministcurrent.com/2020/12/18/an-australian-bill-criminalizing-conversion-therapy-may-harm-kids-deemed-trans-as-well-as-those-who-treat-them/

    1. Yes. When the petition was presented to Parliament the women’s sex-based rights organisation Speark Up For Women made a strong case that there is a substancial difference between conversion therapy applied to sexual orientation and to gender identity. For children and young people in particular banning conversion therapy would mean that counsellors and clinicians could not attempt to address the reasons a young person feels they are ‘in the wrong body’ or are the opposite sex. The Justice Select Committee addressing the petition said that “A ban on conversion therapy should not prevent anyone from seeking or providing such advice. This could be managed by clearly defining “conversion therapy” and “counselling” and also “However, we believe more work needs to be done before any decision is taken to ban it. In particular, thought must be given to how to define conversion therapy, who the ban would apply to, and how to ensure that rights relating to freedom of expression and religion were maintained.’ https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/sc/reports/document/SCR_9275/petition-of-max-tweedie-for-young-labour-and-the-young

  2. I am all for conversion therapy.
    I believe it should be compulsory for National Party voters and ACT voters to be converted to the philosophy of Anarcho-Socialism.
    Mormons, Seventh Day Adventists, radical Muslims, fundamentalist Christians and zionist jews should all be forcibly converted into followers of the Great, heavenly red bellied fire serpent( not to be confused with those heretical scum who worship the Great, Golden Ocean dragon).

  3. I don’t believe in a “magical flying invisible spell casting Wizard for their moral and ethical compass” and from what I have seen so called religious people offering Gay conversion therapy is just another scam.
    Having said that for the last 45 years we have been subject to a campaign to normalize same sex relationships even though there is evidence to suggest that “Adults identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual or ‘other’ are at increased risk of poor mental health and low wellbeing compared to those identifying as heterosexual.” https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-016-0767-z
    Obviously morality is a choice we should all be free to make and since I expect people to respect my right to worship or not (provided it does no harm to other people) I need to allow others to make their own choice regarding moral matters. While you are quick to condemn religious people the essence of real Christianity is Christ in us, being transformed & living a new life that does not walk according to the flesh. The next action for converted people is being willing to share with those who are interested how they can live a better life. Any sort of state control in forbidding or establishing religion is totally wrong (on reflection I think most of us could agree that certain ideas need control although existing laws should suffice) but scripture is also clear about not judging or condemning others so speaking the truth in love should be evident in all we do.
    I

  4. The law comes down full force on those who harm others through exorcism rituals (particularly if those involved are brown), the law operates the same way on those pushing fake medical treatments or conversely on parents withholding life-saving treatment from their children (but not so much if they are middle class and white parents, in those cases media celebrities such as Paul Holmes will champion the parent’s case). This conversion pseudo therapy should be considered in exactly the same manner.
    If harm is the outcome, prosecute.

  5. “I expect people to respect my right to worship or not (provided it does no harm to other people)”

    No one attacked your right to worship anything. They just mocked your choice.
    Religion doesn’t get a free pass from criticism.

    1. Not in this country, every day I see nasty comments about faith. Like non stop actually. No one is stopping you.

  6. The trouble with this Bill is it may criminalise counsellors merely talking things through with clients. Some people from faith homes are depressed about being gay, they are entitled to ask for help with that. In fact anyone over 18 can consult and talk about whatever they like with a health practitioner.

  7. Well Martyn it looks like your opinions are being ignored. Whatever the rights and wrongs it seems woke politics are front and centre of the government (and the Greens agenda) and meaningful change and policies to address homelessness, inequality, housing, climate change etc are in the too hard basket for now. I’m sure this is what the masses were looking for when they cast their votes last year – sarcasm intended!

Comments are closed.