Similar Posts

7 Comments

  1. But wouldn’t people look at these statistics and think that as a proportionally, Maori are more likely to be on a benefit than non-Maori?

      1. What’s called public programmes is infact welfare. About 90%. I don’t know the exact figure but about 90% of tax payer funds go into the TIGER (private capital) bank fees, construction companies and all of that. It’s welfare. If this was real capitalism and they had to sell there junk to us they would go bankrupt almost immediately.

        Ok nubs?

  2. I think of tax avoidance, sorry “tax minimisation’, as a form of welfare.
    In fact Family Trusts probably cost the country coffers more than the DPB.
    Of course, that’s not a fact, its just something I’m guessing at based on the Family Trusts I know about.
    Now, most of these are organised for the benefit of Pakeha families, who tend to have more wealth, but Maori are hardly immune from this sort of carry on, so maybe it would be more helpful to have a conversation about the definition of ‘welfare’ and the fact that it is abused by certain classes more than any particular ethnicity.

  3. That does not surprise me at all with the hollowing out of the middle classes a lot of these people dropped down to the lower classes. So yes I can see how it correlates.

  4. Most wealthy 65 plus year olds who still work and or get profits from their companies also get the benefit. Most of them sign up for the benefit aswell as reaping the money from jobs and businesses. Now that is a true wrought. They don’t need that money yet run to WINZ offices as soon as they turn 65. I am taking about millionaires and multimillionaires. When does that stop…

Comments are closed.