Similar Posts

– Advertisement –

14 Comments

  1. A very informative discussion here
    https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/programmes/saturday/audio/2018939935/should-all-drugs-be-decriminalised

    More than 150 experts have signed an open letter calling on the NZ Government to legalise and regulate all psychoactive substances. The letter marks the launch of the Harm Reduction Coalition Aotearoa, which aims to reduce the negative consequences of drug use in a way that upholds people’s dignity and rights. It’s an idea already in practice in different corners of the world – including Portugal where possession of illicit substances for personal use was decriminalised in 2001. Canada followed in January 2023, with the province of British Columbia, kicking off a three-year trial that allows adults to possess up to 2.5 grams of heroin, fentanyl, cocaine or meth without being arrested, charged, or having their drugs seized – except around schools and airports. However, just over a year into the project it has come under increasing pressure from opponents who have called it a ‘harmful experiment’. Recently some of the measures have been rolled back. Public drug use is now re-criminalised, while drug possession in private homes is still legal. Joining us to discuss are Dr Nuno Capaz, of Lisbon’s Dissuasion Commission of Drug Addiction, Dr Lindsey Richardson from the BC Centre on Substance Use, and Dr Fiona Hutton, a member of the Harm Reduction Coalition Aotearoa.

  2. gotta fill that mega prison – what an effing joke – they have bugger all evidence around the impairment of driving from cannabis – this is just nanny state puriitanism from arseholes playing at lord baron god botherers. Our only hope with these losers in charge, is Maori.

  3. It is supposed to test for recent, not historic use – thus is a measure of impairment.

    It includes all prescription medicine, not just marijuana.

    Those evading the test will end up in prison faster than the others.

    In that it is an imprisonment programmes – but without an drug addiction treatment capability – it is imprisonment of addicts who drive.

    1. It is supposed to test for recent, not historic use, yet historic (as in pervious use and not just on the day) use is also detected.

      Thus, it is not an accurate measure of impairment.

      Where did you get the info it will be an imprisonment programme?

  4. Don’t bother with legal pharma weed, get a med card for $99, which gives you a legal defence for possession of underground.
    Same goes for growing your own for personal use. Keep it under 6 plants like other legal countries have, and wait and see if they take you to court for growing medicine.

  5. “What is going to happen is drivers with .. cannabis in their system will get caught in this new roadside testing because the Test isn’t testing for impairment, it’s simply testing for it in your system.”

    That clearly ilustrates the inherent injustice, corruption, dishonesty, incompetence etc of our so called justice system. You would think some legal team would be able to make the argument that impairment wasn’t tested for and so the defendant can not be said to be impaired on the basis of that test.

  6. It works in Australia. If you have a prescription for medical cannabis you are allow the THC in it to be in your system .

    1. Wonder if it will become like alcohol testing, where it is the certain level after which you get prosecuted.

Comments are closed.