Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

6 Comments

  1. Great post Martyn

    your writing is straight to the point, no holds barred and factual.

    it is so good to see that we have an independent advocacy group like SJA who are no scared of standing up seeking the real truth, and having you to support them to seek that truth.

    it will be interesting to see where this all goes.

  2. To think you have people out there who trundle out some bullshit like “if you are not doing anything wrong then what’s your problem” when it comes to things like surveillance and photography of people/facial recognition and the like. How many more examples do you need to say we need to be very careful with the powers we give the police.

  3. The Allan Hall case is an illustration of police corruption at its most egregious. Not only did the cops investigating Mr Easton’s murder delete crucial information from the statement of an independent witness, without the witness’s knowledge, and then just read the statement at Allan’s trial, which meant the witness did not have to give evidence in person, but they also added information to fit the description of Allan Hall, when in fact the description by the independent witness of the person he/she saw running away from the scene was the complete opposite of Mr Hall and it was this description that was deleted.

    Then, if that was not bad enough, the cops interviewed Mr Hall, who is autistic, for hours and hours and hours non-stop without legal representation. They would have known Mr Hall was autistic yet they callously and brutally denied him his basic right to have a lawyer present, especially to support such a vulnerable and frightened young man.

    The cops, or probably now ex-cops, who did this to Allan Hall need to be called to account. They prosecute other people for perverting justice yet they seem to stand above the law themselves and get away with it, with a sneering air of arrogance and entitlement, time and time again.

    If there is a Royal Commission of Enquiry, and hopefully there is, will it look at the very system that seems to endorse the actions of these and other corrupt cops? Probably not, because the very system that talks about a fair and independent justice system, is the very system that is corrupt. Look at how one visible aspect of the system, the IPCA, works. Because it is made up of retired cops, whose arrogant and corrupt attitude is that the police can do no wrong, corrupt cops are pretty much protected. If a person complains to the IPCA, more often than not, the IPCA dismisses the complaint in a typically harsh and dismissive almost mocking manner that reeks of the very festering sore-like corruption it is meant to be investigating.

    1. Totally agree, the police have made far too many wrongful convictions over the years to accept that it is just a mistake, they are more interested in convictions than making sure that they find the actual guilty person

    2. youngsuffrajet couldn’t agree more. What a wonderful post written with thought and a totally educated view.

      You talk around the IPCA and you are so right. I believe that Jackie Foster of Social Justice Aotearoa is wanting a complete review of the IPCA and wants an independent system where ex police can not ever be involved with.

      Again well written and why dont you reach out to Social Justice Aotearoa to see if you can get involved in some way shape of form.

  4. A conspiracy theory has now been proven a conspiracy fact. This is why people are so quick believe conspiracy theories. Things like this make people lose trust and faith in these institutions. If the majority lose trust and faith in our systems, we are all really stuffed!

Comments are closed.