Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

8 Comments

  1. Run an interest rate
    inflation control lever on unemployment. Unemployed are the feedstock for the “neoliberal welfare industry”. Watch NAct privatise MSD debt to Baycorp, Gravity and the like.

    1. Pretty sure that ACC used to privatise alleged debt to bullying Baycorp, and perhaps they still do.

  2. There is easy evidence that proves Martyn’s point–during peak COVID a second tier benefit was created for middle class people at around $490 per week. People in a relationship where one had lost income, well the partner could keep working full time with no effect on the benefit amount. Try that on a standard Jobseeker!–you will be pursued for years.

    MSD/WINZ know exactly what they are doing with their punitive degrading approach. They knew middle class people would be shocked and appalled if they encountered the vindictive case managers, loss of previously supplied documents, underpayments, and debts that working class people get.

    1. Yes, they created two classes of unemployed, deserving and undeserving,
      Apparently losing your employment through a pandemic means it was not your fault, and you are deserving of support. Losing your employment through retrenchment caused by deliberate Government or employer policy is all YOUR fault, and you are not deserving of basic support, moreover, you should be further punished.
      It was a disgusting display of prejudicial discrimination.

  3. Wait till National’s welfare crackdown gets into full swing, and MSD targets will reward case managers giving sanctions for the most minor breaches, such as not answering a phone call in time. You can imagine the case managers hitting the highest targets after adopting the old 1.25 second phone calling technique. Hmmm was that a crank call, or was it MSD? It’s very quick and easy to stoop to underhanded immoral tactics, just like when MSD used private investigators to dig up dirt on abuse victims. How could the morals of that ever be explained? Is there no policing of the public service?

  4. Since when did people have to borrow benefits and repay at a later date. By definition if you need a benefit then you do not have the ability to repay……wasn’t this obvious when this manic system came into being?

Comments are closed.