Similar Posts

14 Comments

  1. Quick off the mark to prove once again that you have a reading disability Gaby! You cannot even understand the Times of Israel article you linked to. Whatever the outcome of the various legal proceedings of the ICC, which are still to be resolved, Israel is not immune and neither are the various Palestinian Factions. The only difference is that the Palestinians are prepared to front up. The same can’t be said of Israel and its tame lapdog, Joe Biden and even he is reluctant to sully his reputation be talking to Israel’s Zionist leadership. In reality, Gantz, Netanyahu and a raft of ex-IDF and politicians will be isolated at home for years to come – or did you forget what happened to Augusto Pinochet.

    As for, ‘MFAT, ignoring this nonsense’, perhaps you hadn’t noticed, there is an international change in thinking. Calling people anti-semetic because they don’t condone human rights abuses isn’t cutting the mustard the way it used to. The end may also be in sight for the Israeli Air Force not giving a damn about the sovereignty over the airspace of other states. I would provide links but that would be a waste of time as you seldom show any inclination to look at evidence outside the comfort of your own little bubbles of propagandist opinion pieces.

  2. “Will Nanaia Mahuta, at last, show some concern and declare solidarity with indigenous Palestinians?” Sadly, when it comes to Israel, even ‘No-Nukes’ Lange, who could stand up to ANZUS, had to kowtow to any US/Israel threats. So, why would anyone expect Ardern and her Foreign Minister to join the international growing moral majority who are opposed to human rights abuses, whoever commits them? It’s easier to pick on a relative small-fry like Myanmar, even if it means siding with a compromised Nobel Peace Prize recipient, who is arguable guilty of collusion in human rights abuses. Ultimately the NZ Government will be tacitly accommodating of the inevitable sanctions (war crimes) that will impact on the weakest citizens of Myanmar. Odds on, the Government will also not cancel military contacts and arms orders from Israel, despite knowing the latter have been tested on the residents of occupied territories.

    To give both Ardern and Mahuta a bit of credit though, so far it seems neither have been photographed snuggling up to Zionist Israeli leaders. Perhaps fealty has its limits.

  3. One of the most frequent deceits of Zionist hasbara is the pushing and pulling of the timeline. In any conflict, this can make an attack seem like a defence and vice versa. How many times have we heard that “seven well equipped Arab armies attempted to destroy the poorly armed and newly founded ‘Jewish State’?”
    This is the foundation on which this (Gaby) trope – “Palestinians’ horrific war crimes” – is built.
    Some simple historic facts utterly destroy this myth.
    By May 15 1948 when the Arab League notified the Security Council of their intent to protect the citizens of Palestine, the predominant motivation was contained in their declaration – a quarter of a million Palestinians had been forced from their homes and made refugees.
    In “Under the Cover of War: The Zionist Expulsion of the Palestinians” Rosemarie M. Esber (PHD London, Johns Hopkins) uses British archives and oral testimonies from Palestinian survivors as well as previously used sources to demonstrate that there was a purposeful, systematic pattern by which Zionist forces depopulated Palestinian cities and villages before the end of the British mandate on 15 May 1948 and the subsequent intervention of Arab armies. She concludes that the total ethically cleansed before the League intervened was at least 400,000. Esber also uses Morris’ own research to demonstrate the premeditated nature of the Palestinian expulsion – as if Morris’ own words (from an interview with Avi Shavit) were not enough:

    “Interviewer: According to your new findings, how many cases of Israeli rape were there in 1948?

    Morris: About a dozen. In Acre four soldiers raped a girl and murdered her and her father. In Jaffa, soldiers of the Kiryati Brigade raped one girl and tried to rape several more. At Hunin, which is in the Galilee, two girls were raped and then murdered. There were one or two cases of rape at Tantura, south of Haifa. There was one case of rape at Qula, in the center of the country. At the village of Abu Shusha, near Kibbutz Gezer [in the Ramle area] there were four female prisoners, one of whom was raped a number of times. And there were other cases. Usually more than one soldier was involved. Usually there were one or two Palestinian girls. In a large proportion of the cases the event ended with murder. Because neither the victims nor the rapists liked to report these events, we have to assume that the dozen cases of rape that were reported, which I found, are not the whole story. They are just the tip of the iceberg.

    Interviewer: According to your findings, how many acts of Israeli massacre were perpetrated in 1948?

    Morris: Twenty-four. In some cases four or five people were executed, in others the numbers were 70, 80, 100. There was also a great deal of arbitrary killing. Two old men are spotted walking in a field – they are shot. A woman is found in an abandoned village – she is shot. There are cases such as the village of Dawayima [in the Hebron region], in which a column entered the village with all guns blazing and killed anything that moved.
    The worst cases were Saliha (70-80 killed), Deir Yassin (100-110), Lod (250), Dawayima (hundreds) and perhaps Abu Shusha (70). There is no unequivocal proof of a large-scale massacre at Tantura, but war crimes were perpetrated there. At Jaffa there was a massacre about which nothing had been known until now. The same at Arab al Muwassi, in the north. About half of the acts of massacre were part of Operation Hiram [in the north, in October 1948]: at Safsaf, Saliha, Jish, Eilaboun, Arab al Muwasi, Deir al Asad, Majdal Krum, Sasa. In Operation Hiram there was a unusually high concentration of executions of people against a wall or next to a well in an orderly fashion.
    That can’t be chance. It’s a pattern. Apparently, various officers who took part in the operation understood that the expulsion order they received permitted them to do these deeds in order to encourage the population to take to the roads. The fact is that no one was punished for these acts of murder. Ben-Gurion silenced the matter. He covered up for the officers who did the massacres.

    Interviewer: What you are telling me here, as though by the way, is that in Operation Hiram there was a comprehensive and explicit expulsion order. Is that right?

    Morris: Yes. One of the revelations in the book is that on October 31, 1948, the commander of the Northern Front, Moshe Carmel, issued an order in writing to his units to expedite the removal of the Arab population. Carmel took this action immediately after a visit by Ben-Gurion to the Northern Command in Nazareth. There is no doubt in my mind that this order originated with Ben-Gurion. Just as the expulsion order for the city of Lod, which was signed by Yitzhak Rabin, was issued immediately after Ben-Gurion visited the headquarters of Operation Dani [July 1948].”

Comments are closed.