Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

8 Comments

  1. Social Welfare psychologist, Sue Sidey, conducted most of the 118 evidential child interviews used at the trial, Not the police. But they sure relied upon it.

    The entire interviewing process was flawed with big delays between initial disclosure and interviews and with little kids, last week is a lifetime ago. And Sidley wasn’t an expert interviewer, and to be fair its not certain there was such a thing then. It was that flawed interview process that police relied upon that was the problem!

    I get you unquestionably hate the police but if thats all you ever want to see then you miss all the other real issues that were the real cause. The whole process from go to whoa with ALL agencies involved was in hindsight, very poor.

  2. Tim Barnett chaired the Justice and Electoral committee that considered petition calling for Royal Commission for Ellis 2003.

    The committee finally reported after an unprecedented two years of consideration, released, get this, on the day Parliament rose before the 2005 election season, thus cravenly avoiding Q@A scrutiny.

    The whole exercise of committee deliberations was a sham, designed to delay the issue and bury the adverse publicity the case received after Goff’s sham Eichelbaum Inquiry and release of Hood’s book.

    I was at Barnett’s Press conference when the committee’s findings were released, his dissimulation was loathsome.

    1. The mystery of justice ministers and how they behaved, is yet to be explained, if ever. Philip Goff and the Clarke administration was severely compromised so can be discounted as impartial. I would like to hear some reasons from the Key era ministers as why they didn’t do anything. Chris Finlayson has quite a lot to say, but unusually nothing much about Peter Ellis. Whether they were bullied into submission by Sian Elias et al is just conjecture.

      1. How much do those politicians “in charge” wait for retirements or deaths of important players to happen?

      2. “The mystery of justice ministers and how they behaved, is yet to be explained, if ever. ”

        There was at least one complainant parent working in the Beehive for a Govt minister over that period [circa early 2000s].

        Court orders prohibiting the identification of complainants has prevented much explanatory information becoming public. It’s an unbelievably murky business.

        .

Comments are closed.