Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

26 Comments

  1. Well it is a start and hopefully now the Labour Party has waded a little way into the sea of Welfare State it will be prepared to soon plunge its head under.
    If history follows the example of the 1930s voters will follow.
    A historical reference to the harping of Hoskings and others and the whine of Auntie Herald:
    In 1935 only ONE New Zealand newspaper ( The Greymouth Argus) supported the Labour Party. Post Office engineers were instructed to sabotage Labour Party political broadcasts and the business community were united in condemning socialism.
    Labour’s election victory then shows the New Zealand public are more sensible than they are given credit for. Long may it continue.

  2. There can be no genuinely left wing budget until something genuine, meaningful and visionary is done about a state housing programme. The proposed benefit increases will just feed the landlords.

    1. We are going to have to pay for the pandemic. These post left attitudes just need to be rejected even though some post left attitudes should be embraced. When we look at Savages new deal they where paying below market wages and under estimate how much a 2% to 6% jump in government spending was aimed at businesses which wasn’t funded by deficit spending but high taxes because unlike a war economy we’re not trying to destroy overdeveloped capital, we’re trying to genocide a virus.

    2. I think, RosieLee, that credit should be given where credit is due. Robertson, himself, acknowledges that there is still much to do, but this is, at least, a start.

      If, as you suggest, landlords attempt to appropriate these benefit increases by upping their rents, then the Government should immediately impose rent controls.

      1. Seems sensible ( like those at TDB have suggested) that there is a preemptive rent freeze so that as bert says ‘greedy scumlords’ cannot skim the cream off the top and by doing so, defraud the taxpayer of their input, – many of whom are actually now renters themselves…

      1. I think you are right on the button Bert and I wonder why it cannot be seen by those in power .
        There were some good moves in this budget for benefituries but why did sectors like small businesses get no help to get tooled up for these promised infrastructure jobs

        1. Any employed proffesor worth his salt would understand that a market solely consisting of small business is agile, but you’ll have the same issue – with a forced ceiling on development, no one’s innovations are going to spread out very far simply because they can’t grow big enough to meet the demand or pay for the pandemic. 🙂

    3. I totally agree. This government has a scattergun approach to liberal ideals and throws money at everything and anything (much of it worthy) but they are strangely reluctant to follow labour socialist principals about housing and infrastructure and minority needs (Not just the ‘in’ minorities).

      I had such high hopes for housing and after 4 years, the governments performance in this area is piddling. I think they are technically the weakest government we have had in a long time and one of the least transparent. “As far as we know, there is no sign that landlords will increase rent, yeah right”.

  3. I don’t see it that way at all. I see it as a farm manager finally noticing (after spending most of his time watching corporatised sport and eating and drinking and sleeping) that the livestock is in poor condition and dying from malnutrition and abuse.

    The poor state of the livestock has been noticed by people elsewhere, and now the livestock manager feels obliged to get off his/her backside and do something.

    Far too late, of course.

    The older livestock is full of tumours, and the younger livestock is not properly developed as a consequence of neglect, poor diet and poor living conditions, i.e. up to their knees in shit.

    ‘Interesting times’ get more ‘interesting’ a the entire system continues to walk the path that leads to extinction of the human species via further looting and pollution of the commons, which is exactly what Grant Robertson has advocated.

    He will never NEVER admit that fundamental truth, of course -well maybe in his death bed- and will describe his plans for the future as ‘sustainable development’, which is an oxymoron, since there is no such thing as sustainable development -other than the establishment of permaculture gardens- and development is what got us into this mess.

  4. Who the hell wrote this piece? Give that person a medal or three. Right on the money IMO. This Labour Govt. is finally delivering a powerful kick in the balls to Neo Liberalism and the greedy Boomers that have profited at the expense of there children and grandchildren. Also a big fuck you to Natz and Act and there selfish arrogant fan base. This is how to roll out anti Neo-Lib policy, with small changes to be sure but the accumulative effect is heading in the right direction – Left. Well done Labour, Greens and Maori Party.

    1. Yes when Seymour is screaming to high heaven, we know the budgets a winner and when he throws accolades at Richardsons 91 budget you know he’s not quite all there.

      1. …”and when he throws accolades at Richardsons 91 budget you know he’s not quite all there”…

        ——————-

        ROFL !, – Look into the mans eyes and he does look kind of,… vacant…too long on the Red Dwarf,… a real space cadet with a great big capital H on his forehead.

    2. …”Also a big fuck you to Natz and Act and there selfish arrogant fan base”…

      Right on there, GreenBus !!! And indeed whoever wrote this piece SHOULD be given a medal or three.

  5. I have just watched the interview of the people (advocates) misled by LINO into believing the government cares about people with relatively rare diseases, cancers and diabetes etc. who will die over the coming months or years because there is ‘no money’ for targeting medications.

    Funny there is always so much money available for Americas Cup etc,

  6. Brilliant article. Absolutely brill.

    It hit all the high notes of our recent 3 decades long battle with the cancer we call neo liberalism. I see this budget as a small step in the right direction and like Robertson , thinking there is still much , much more to be done. But its a very good start nonetheless.

    If Labour continue on this path, they have definitely secured my party vote. It is the meat and potato’s budget of the things that really matter, – not the vaudeville sideshow acts of woke politics.

    I am elated by it and the recent moves towards compulsory unionism, and the cap on wanton open door immigrations settings that bring in yet even more cheap labour from overseas. It is now a time for consolidation of the people we already have and make this place a prosperous land yet again. Neo liberalism out, Keynesianism in.

    A modified form of Keynesianism, but Keynesianism nonetheless. And if we ever get to the point of looking somewhat like the Scandinavian states, we will know we have arrived. Those country’s with the highest per capita taxation but also the highest salary’s , wages and standards of living in the world.

  7. #1 rejected headline by DomPost “Robertson put Ruthanasia to Rest”

  8. Good summation.

    I agree, and I am very glad Labour are starting to finally power up.

  9. I truly wish it were so.
    I’ll consider neoliberalism to be on the ropes once I see re-nationalisation of industries and assets stolen from the Commons. Before then we are getting only anaesthetising balms.

    1. …”I’ll consider neoliberalism to be on the ropes once I see re-nationalisation of industries and assets stolen from the Commons”…

      That is indeed the litmus test.

Comments are closed.