Similar Posts

13 Comments

  1. Hi martyn;

    Yes to that; – so as government want the upper hand in all things;

    The government is advised by their “experts” to roll back the effectiveness of opposition to any changes they wish to make, and request to cutting budgets that give the people a strong legal case through legal means.

    So the government will take the easy route to stymie our voices and our democratic voice to be heard.

    We are just playthings for their ego it seems.

  2. 100% MICHELLE;

    National have purposely underfunded every agency we have to reduce our ability to legally fight for changes against their autocratic crass criminal enterprise.

    National equals cruel crimes against the people.

  3. Police enforce the dictates of the Government. Nothing more nothing less. They do not exist for us, the people.

    1. It must be assumed that any government agent or agency that can not explain an asset that is outside of the salary that that official is corrupted. The burden of prof must them fall on the accused to justify unusual so ending.

  4. Police enforce the dictates of the Government. Nothing more nothing less. They do not exist for us, the people. Police control on behalf of the controllers.

  5. Martyn,

    It is my understanding that the funding for the Human Rights Commission, the Human Rights Review Tribunal and the Office of Human Rights Proceedings was frozen, and maybe reduced around about the time of the May 2010 budget. I could be wrong, but maybe someone with more time could look into this?

    No coincidence this fiscal strangling of our Human Rights watchdog that it happened shortly after this, http://www.nzlii.org/nz/cases/NZHRRT/2010/1.html and the following two successful court cases….all won resoundingly by the team from the OHRP.

    After this….http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2013/0022/latest/whole.html Those of us who had trusted the HRC when we had been told that the outcome of Atkinson would apply to us were bitterly disappointed….although the OHRP kept in touch.

    After this…https://www.stuff.co.nz/auckland/68270809/court-says-carer-of-disabled-adult-can-sue-for-compensation the door opened a crack for those of us shut out by the 2013 legislation and a small group of us will be heading to the High Court early next year seeking compensation.

    We are represented by the Office of Human Rights Proceedings.

    National responded to the OHRP winning this case against the Ministry of Health and Crown Law with viciousness and vindictiveness.

  6. David Fisher, one of the few journalists we have left, who know how to point the finger on where the truth needs to be exposed.

    This is scandalous, but has there been an increase in claims to the HRRT? I would not be surprised, given the rough shooting in public administration that became the new normal.

    More mean spirited government agencies lead to more complaints.

    Also have other so called ‘watch dogs’ had significant increases in complaints over recent years. Some say it is due to people being more happy to lay complaints, I argue, there are more issues that deserve to be raised and addressed, as people feel treated unfairly and short changed. Hence the increase in complaints.

    We had the same with the Ombudsman under Beverley Wakem, under funding and so forth. They now have new procedures, a bit more funding, but also throw more complaints out, as not worthy to investigate, or refer them to other review panels.

    With a growing population all these offices and hearing institutions need more funding, but National kept them tightly controlled, so Labour and NZ First and Greens are challenged now to deliver, come on, invest a bit more into all these necessary review institutions, please.

Comments are closed.