Otago farmer receives formal warning for illegal sow stall use – SAFE
SAFE are deeply frustrated with MPI for only issuing a warning to a Timaru pig farm after an investigation was prompted by shocking footage of illegal animal cruelty captured by Farmwatch.
MPI animal welfare inspectors visited the Timaru pig farm in July this year after footage released by Farmwatch showed pigs kept in sow stalls, which have been illegal since 2015. A recent statement made by MPI announced that the farm was only issued with a warning.
SAFE’s Head of Campaigns, Marianne Macdonald, says this is further evidence that MPI is incapable of holding the pig industry to account when they break the law which is why we are asking the Government to protect animal welfare with an independent crown entity with adequate regulatory and enforcement powers.
“The current monitoring and enforcement model is
The same farm was shown to be using farrowing crates much too small for the sows confined within them.
“At the vulnerable time these mother pigs were trying to nurture their babies, they were in crates so small that metal bars dug into their sides. Many were unable to lie down without having their faces wedged under their feeding troughs, as the crates were shorter than their bodies. This is an appalling way to treat any animal, especially one who has just given birth.”
Last week SAFE gave an oral submission to the Primary Production Select Committee, where they pressed the Government to ban the use of farrowing crates.
“This week we’ve seen Countdown supermarkets
The link below is from the MPI website. It is most disappointing that it issued only a warning to the Timaru pig farmer but it will probably say that the new regulations which, according to the link came into force in October 2018, do not cover the Timaru pig farmer whose atrocious conduct was detected in July.
When you think about it, what will a warning achieve? Nothing. The animal abuser who obviously endorses cruelty to animals but who calls himself a pig “farmer” will treat it with contempt – like he does his animals.
Surely MPI could have taken more appropriate action against him even without the new regulations. But when you read the article it becomes obvious that they conduct a sort of triage type exercise and, in their own words, prosecute only the worst cases. Who decides what constitutes “the worst case”? Isn’t keeping pigs in the way this farmer did a “worst case” scenario?
So yes, it does look like MPI are incapable of holding the pig industry to account. They probably have skin in the game.
https://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-and-resources/media-releases/one-month-until-new-animal-welfare-regulations/
Yes we need to take MPI apart and rebuild it again and throw the National cling-ons out.
Timaru is Cantebury, not Otago! Not that it makes a difference to animal cruelty, it just shows how Oblivious Aucklanders are regarding Provincial boundary’s north or south of the Auckland side of the Bombay hills.