Similar Posts

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3 Comments

  1. Timaru is Cantebury, not Otago! Not that it makes a difference to animal cruelty, it just shows how Oblivious Aucklanders are regarding Provincial boundary’s north or south of the Auckland side of the Bombay hills.

  2. The link below is from the MPI website. It is most disappointing that it issued only a warning to the Timaru pig farmer but it will probably say that the new regulations which, according to the link came into force in October 2018, do not cover the Timaru pig farmer whose atrocious conduct was detected in July.

    When you think about it, what will a warning achieve? Nothing. The animal abuser who obviously endorses cruelty to animals but who calls himself a pig “farmer” will treat it with contempt – like he does his animals.

    Surely MPI could have taken more appropriate action against him even without the new regulations. But when you read the article it becomes obvious that they conduct a sort of triage type exercise and, in their own words, prosecute only the worst cases. Who decides what constitutes “the worst case”? Isn’t keeping pigs in the way this farmer did a “worst case” scenario?

    So yes, it does look like MPI are incapable of holding the pig industry to account. They probably have skin in the game.

    https://www.mpi.govt.nz/news-and-resources/media-releases/one-month-until-new-animal-welfare-regulations/