Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

16 Comments

  1. The best and only thing we need to concentrate on is adaption. 99% of the effects of climate change on us come from offshore. Every man for himself.

    1. That’s silly. If everyone concentrated on just adaption (which is what that thinking will lead to) we are screwed, because if we don’t mitigate the change, adaptation will always be playing catch up with an ever growing problem. Without mitigation, the effects will accelerate faster than we can adapt … so

      1. Well you better hope like hell the big polluting nations follow your mitigation advice coz if they don’t your screwed.

  2. Other existential threats are the Hikurangi subduction zone earthquake, a Southern Alps earthquake, Lake Taupo eruption. All of which could happen tomorrow apparently (maybe not Lake Taupo). The Auckland volcanic field could wake up too. And a big meteor could crash into us. We are being poisoned by micro plastics turning into nano plastics. And the ozone hole could get bigger and leave us exposed to space radiation. That will happen as more methane is released.
    If the Gulf Stream stops it will cause a metre of water to rise almost immediately, and the reason it is slowing down is because all the fresh water melt is diluting the salt water, which slows the Gulf Stream (AMOC) circulation until it stops. It has slowed down so much it may be on the brink of stopping altogether. So that process is already in action.
    There is no question of ice shelf melt in the Antarctic and Greenland happening and as the ice shelf holding back the glaciers are melting at an unbelievable rate from underneath, eventually the glaciers will slip into the sea, probably rapidly. All these triggers to sea level rise are already happening.
    All of the signs of climate change caused by humans was known in the 1960s and the results of that -atmospheric rivers and wildfires were predicted. Nothing was done about it then and nothing meaningful is being done now.

    1. Yeah don’t know how solo/single mothers got into the all-pervasive climate change discussion. Because as you say Lone Comet there are huge numbers of existential* threats.

      Personally I am going to buy a container full of boxes of assorted chocolates. Than when the stress becomes too great I will sit in a corner, by the container which will have a small door in the bottom. and gradually eat my way though all the chocolates. I’ll have a bucket of water and dipper, a toilet nearby, and a pen and pad and write feedback on which flavoured centre I like and how they could be improved generally. And whether they should have more or less sugar, and whether the growers of cacao beans are getting fair price (there used to be a real rort on payment as the beans passed through middlemen clipping ticket on their way to the manufacturers.) That will be my nirvana (a state of enlightenment, meaning a person’s individual desires and suffering go away.).

      Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
      existential
      /ˌɛɡzɪˈstɛnʃl/ adjective: existential

      relating to existence.
      “the climate crisis is an existential threat to the world”
      Philosophy :
      concerned with existentialism.
      “the existential dilemma is this: because we are free, we are also inherently responsible”
      Logic :
      (of a proposition) affirming or implying the existence of a thing.
      “the existential proposition that truth and reality are constructed fictions”

  3. Whaaaaat????? Yeah Bradbury, you invited this idiot with your dumb comment about bitter solo mothers.

        1. The rule is 60% of youth suicide come from single mother households. 90% of homelessness. 70% of children with behavioural problems are from single mother homes. 80% of rapists with anger issues are from single mother homes. That’s a hard pass.

          1. Just shows how hard a task that single mothers face. Just think why would they stay in this difficult situation if there was a good partner around to share the tasks and their lives with? Some single mothers are mad, some are bad, and all of them and their sex partners too have been brought up in a declining moral culture, with poor effects from tv and films to watch for ideas about life. Their parents the same. Schools now enforcing new values, despite those that parents may want to convey – trans etc. Everything changing, and drugs and alcohol, self-indulgence eating away at steadfast commitment to the difficult tasks. Government hate of mothers and high social class unwillingness to consider children taonga and enable parents to be supported, they sending theirs to ‘good’ schools or boarding schools. Spending little time with their children just talking to them about values, probably they don’t have any anyway – money is the measure of being good. But go on Sam pick out scapegoats, that is what psychology and propaganda did to the Jews in the 1930’s.

          2. Fathers are always blamed for the bad choices of woman. Woman have condoms, birth control, abortion. Woman get the lions share of custody and childsupport and a legal system that rightly or wrongly inforces the idea that the children should live with the mother when we know 100% that that produces the worst outcomes. Just look at the results of femism. It’s terrible.

Comments are closed.