Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

9 Comments

  1. The idea that the crisis of western democracy and the climate crisis can be jointly resolved by extending the franchise to 16 year olds is hopeful indeed.
    If 16 year olds get to vote in parliamentary elections, they will end up in the same powerless and disillusioned state as the 18, 20, 22 and 24 year olds.
    These proposals would be akin to putting out a few more deck chairs on the “Titanic”.
    If the 16 years want to effect real change they should continue with extra-parliamentary direct action, acts of civil disobedience, and the development of alternative genuinely democratic institutions of government.

    1. Agree.
      We might also get some interesting bills put forward though, the “no homework bill”, or some legislation on what time Dads car has to be back.
      Or the PlayStation bill 2019.
      Think of the possibilities.
      Giving a vote to kids that don’t know what a full time job is….. not a good idea.
      How about an upper voting age?
      Or you either get National super or a vote but not both?

    2. Why’s it hopeful? At 16 years old parents are still somewhat responsible for them, and would presumably have to take them voting (drive them or what ever). The only reason to go against this is if certain people wanted less voters and not more. Although any younger than 16 and the bellow 16 year olds will probably just vote for who there parents say to vote for so I think 16 is the bottom.

  2. We could have real Democracy, and vote on policies, like the Swiss do, or we can continue fiddling around the edges, leaving all the real power to those who have the most money.Which is not boomers BTW. It is a long time, if ever, since boomers were over half of actual, voters.

  3. I fully support extending the right for 16 year olds to vote. If anything, taxation without representation is anathema to a democratic system;

    ” The Government has been accused of penny-pinching from kids to make ends meet after it cut children’s tax credits in Budget 2012.

    Revenue Minister Peter Dunne announced yesterday that school-aged children would no longer get a tax refund if they earned wages for part-time work.”

    ref: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10808314

    However, let’s not expect young people to automatically vote for progressive parties. As a young person in my teens and 20s I was embarrassingly right-wing in most of my views. How right wing? Let’s just say Act on Campus would’ve welcomed me with open arms.

    It took years, plus events like the felling of native forests at Pureora and the 1973 Chilean coup d’état, for me to turn my back on the Right and pursue more humane politics. (In fact, the older I get, the further to the Left I seem to be shifting. I’ll be a card-carrying marxist-leninist/maoist by the time I hit retirement…)

    So while I 100% support extending the right to vote, it may not be as positive for progressive policies as we might hope.

  4. 16 Years old can wait like we had to, no need to grow up too fast when they start paying taxes they can vote what is the hurry 18 years old don’t even vote so why push for 16 year olds who are still kids maybe if we get some civic education in schools then we can look to change but what we need now is a campaign to encourage those who can vote to do so as voter turn out is poor and sad for democracy.

  5. That’s right Martyn . We ought to let children vote. They have full maturity, excellent comprehension skills and life experience enough to quickly discern when politicians are lying (using marketing spin), not to mention they have a full overview of NZ’s past 40 years to tell how and why the quality of life in NZ has done a drastic U-Turn, and what changes are needed to reverse this trend.
    In fact we should let 16 year olds run the country. Oh wait… its heading that way already

Comments are closed.