Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

27 Comments

    1. You mean the Act they already repealed? Where does it say that in the article? Regardless who is the government?

      1. Every time Labour opposes something, the media should ask them if they are going to repeal it.

        Labour currently lack credibility. Therefore, when they oppose something yet can’t confirm they will repeal it, it doesn’t help build their credibility.

        Crime was an election issue and Labour (who some deem are soft on crime) now look (by not ruling this out) as if they are trying to have a bet each way. Further destroying their credibility.

  1. I like 3 Strkes. Everyone seems to be worrying about the offender especially if they are maori or pacifica. I’m more concerned for the victims. I don’t want longer sentences to punish the offender. I’m not scared or angry or vengeful. I want a longer sentence to protect women for a longer period of time. After 3 strikes the rights of the offender to humane treatment or rehabilitation no longer interest me. The safety of our mothers, sisters and daughters matter more.

  2. Well of course we need to make criminals suffer! Sjambok Girl Du Plessis Allan tells us so!
    God forbid we follow the example of Scandinavian countries where criminals are housed in comfortable conditions, given addiction counselling and rehabilitation. Does that work? Does it reduce crime?
    (Well actually it does, along with decent education, good childcare, generous benefit payments, fair taxation, humane immigration policies – but think of the readjustments Labour and National would have to make to fit all that in!)
    All we need now is some smartarse to tell us that repeating the same experiment and expecting different results is insanity but look at our record as voters. We should know that but we keep doing it.

  3. Private Prison expansion is one obvious goal of Act here. Bump up the numbers, increase profits for capital–baked beans on paper plates with a side of brutality. Kelvin Davis actually got the numbers down by several thousand with simple measures such as supplying assistance to illiterate inmates to fill out forms!–which previously had kept people in for months because paper trails had not been completed.

    Where I live in Tai Tokerau one of the common reasons for getting stopped by cops is “driving while Māori”, cops photograph and take DNA from young Māori with no lawful cause–they do it because they get away with it and Three Strikes is just going to add to the profiling and racism.

  4. And where do they live Gerald Mann, do we put them all on an island and they can practice lord of the flies such a dumb misinformed comment.
    Speaking as a victim I think we need to increase the sentences for heinous crimes, have better crime prevention and improve rehab for those who show a willingness to want to change. At the moment rehabilitation and the interventions, I mentioned are shoddy in our country. Three strikes policy comes from America, and it didn’t work there nor has the death penalty.

  5. If you can’t function in society after one conviction then maybe society should be protected and you removed from it? Why should communities bear the burden of your selfish acts? If there is bias in the judicial system then why not standardize sentences – life should mean life – with no more reduced sentences for play acted regret or remorse. We only get one crack at this life, one swing at the pitch, and time and resources and people are precious. Society should not be expected to nurse you through your violent meth stage or knife fixation and we don’t need criminal apologists gaslighting us into thinking that civil society is the problem. That we should feel the pain of our abuser and be incarcerated along with our offenders for ever more. No thanks.

    1. Mr woke it’s not standardized sentences as you say, the justice system looks at precedents other cases similar when they sentence people, and they look at the persons past record if they have one, there background and contributions to society and the serious nature of the crime. The judges weigh everything up and prison is often the last resort and so it should be. Based on your comments we will need another billion-dollar prison and keep people locked up forever not exactly the ideal society many NZers would want.

  6. Lets not stop there. Bring in concealed carry laws because as we know the best way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun. Guns dont kill people, people do. And mainly the mentally ill so lets take a knife to ‘mental health services to give them a head start. You want evidence based law and order policy? Look no further than America. Land of the free thinking idiot corrupted by Fox News, living in a crime free paradise.

    1. get them high on crack first.. pity we have to do that speed crack and can’t even afford to crack cocaine – anyone got a fiddy?

  7. Labour should drop their opposition to 3 strikes or at least let their supporters vote on it, violent crime affects lower income areas more than affluent areas and removing the worst offenders benefits them more directly.

    1. and why is that Daniel? I suggest a PhD in Psychiatry with a fair bit of philosophy thrown in. Then you might see the trap you live in. The lower incomes don’t need any of that, they live it, on the daily and they’re good at it esp. the psychopaths amongst them. The upper income psychos are lauded as heroes. I bet you wanna get that new boat – eh? So you can hang out with Luxo and his mates.

      How about including the worst offenders? How about we stop fucking creating them? I fucking hate capitalist wannabe’s

  8. Maximum sentence – a private prison wet dream for cuckservatives.

    How about no prisons? how about local accountability? It might sound like a soft play but it’s really hard – and we’ve all gone soft.. It’s actually a “community” level thing – we all know who the bad buggers are but too scared to stand up to them and offer them a way out. Eliminating vice would be a good start, and I don’t mean by regulating it more.

    It’s crony capitalism, stupid. It’s state sponsored malfeasance.

    Freedom comes at a price, and I’m not seeing many willing to pay it. So, pull down ya shutters, stay in your homes and play with your things.

  9. Mr woke it’s not standardized sentences as you say, the justice system looks at precedents other cases similar when they sentence people, and they look at the persons past record if they have one, there background and contributions to society and the serious nature of the crime. The judges weigh everything up and prison is often the last resort and so it should be. Based on your comments we will need another billion-dollar prison and keep people locked up forever not exactly the ideal society many NZers would want.

Comments are closed.