Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

14 Comments

  1. You say: ‘Inflation is an increase in the supply of paper currency, once it enters circulation.’ This is a neo-liberal doctrine. i.e. too much money supply causes inflation.
    The supply of paper currency comes from two places. !. Banks, they provide credit to people and organisations mostly with assets already and at the same time give themselves an asset- the obligation of the borrower to repay (with interest). The banks equity is not changed and depositors money is not altered. (Economic dogma here is refuted- Bank of England 2014 statement justifies this).
    2. The government creates money creating a deficit in its books and mostly uses that for the public good (no corresponding income stream).
    Inflation is caused by corporations raising prices because they can (Note how big outfits have increased their profits during the pandemic) and raw materials require more inputs to extract as the cheap to extract raw materials get used up. And of course some inflation is imported.
    The reductionist approach of economists (called ceteris paribus) looking at one influence at a time does not allow for the interactions of multiple factors all at once. Such interactions produces complex behaviours of complex systems can defy understanding unless ‘complex systems analysis’ is understanding of economists is revolutionised. The complex weather system using modern computers gets enough understanding to predict weather a few days ahead so why cannot economists upgrade a century or two in analysis?

    1. Inflation is now, and has always been, a purely monetary phenomenon. Less money in the system chasing the same amount of goods and services = less inflation. Whenever increases in productivity (due to technological advances) do not match the increase in money supply chasing said good and services you will inevitably get inflation. Given that lending (both public and private) comes at a cost (interest), interest is easily the easiest way to both stimulate (lower interest) or stifle (raise interest) demand which ties directly to inflationary pressure.

  2. That’s not good news at all. It means the economy is so weak that the R.B.N.Z. is already getting ready to pivot, even when real rates are still well into the negatives!

    They are going down the route of trying to inflate away the unpayable debt, which politically is the path of least resistance. (Ten years of negative real rates and inflation?)

    But why nobody (other than Steve Keen) is proposing a debt write-off scheme (similar to T.A.R.P.) is a complete mystery to me.

    High inflation is terrible for company profitability, and if we end up in stagflation, it will be like the 1970s on steroids.

  3. Not good news that interest rates are up for those that borrow money, aka the poor!

    Food and construction are already going into the stratosphere and probably getting worse now with agriculture being knocked out, so not sure how making families pay more for their mortgage is going to help.

    Bear in mind that when the insurance pays out, the banks take the insurance money to pay back their mortgage and the people are left with very little or nothing.

  4. So the only way to stop inflation is
    1. Increase interest rates so that everyone has to give more money to the Aussie banks and spend less money locally.
    2. Which leads to Orr’s second target of throwing 50-60,000 people/families on the unemployment dung heap and further reduce the inflationary demand of these people.
    Can anyone outline any alternatives?
    Also the TSB bank created the money for my mortgage 20 years ago at a certain cost. Why is the interest rate on my mortgage going up and down. Surely they are not recreating my mortgage money every year.

  5. I don’t think this is the way to go. It is disastrous for the economy. Teachers are about to strike. The nurses have already had a strike during the pandemic. Surely this should tell us something about their wages. It is good to focus on infrastructure but not to the detriment of good quality staff.

    1. HAHAHAHAHA

      Like renters have anything left after you and your greed of the last 10 years.

      Time to suck it up snowflake.

  6. Economics 101

    Inflation is locked in for the next 10 years as the boomers all retire.

    Who would have though it, the selfish generation would wipe out capitalism with their greed.

    1. There is no cohesive group called boomers therefore there is no cohesive action or effect from them. They are as diverse as Gen Z or any other group.
      Using terms like Boomer etc is the same as if I said; ‘all people who do Economics 101 are complete idiots.’ It’s clearly not true for all people but it is for some.

Comments are closed.