Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

12 Comments

  1. Nice email to himself from Jobs. Except, except he did not say this: “I do not scrub my own shit off the side of the toilet bowl”. All but two of the things he said that he did not do, are fine and grandiose things. Only growing food and making clothes are mundane. He needed to go further. Everything that is necessary for life and happiness is created collectively.

  2. Financial transaction tax would be much better. Fair and extremely difficult to dodge.

  3. This could be helpful for Chippy introducing something new or uncomfortable; better the reaction from those behind him, or those he is facing off.

    [Two sales pitches – one straight and pleasant, the second same with a wee joke.]’.. we used it to test a simple question: Can one joke make a meaningful difference in how people are viewed by others? In our study, the answer was unequivocally yes.

    Participants who heard the second presenter make the joke rated him as more confident and more competent than those who heard his joke-free delivery. The jokey presenter was also more likely to be voted as the leader for subsequent group tasks.

    We tend to view humor as an ancillary leadership behavior. In fact, it’s a powerful tool that some people use instinctively but more could wield purposefully. One good laugh—or better still, a workplace culture that encourages levity—facilitates interpersonal communication and builds social cohesion.
    https://hbr.org/2020/07/sarcasm-self-deprecation-and-inside-jokes-a-users-guide-to-humor-at-work

  4. Really good points, and I have bookmarked this. Fundamentally, as income to wages and salaries has declined as a % of the total and incomes to capital have grown, so, the old-fashioned tendency to rely on taxation of wages and salaries can no longer carry the burden, and we have to be thinking of more taxes on capital income.

  5. Define a wealth tax ? or are you talking about a net asset tax –
    then how you tax it – 20 years ago anyone with a million dollars in assets was “wealthy” today that million won’t buy a decent house in Auckland.
    If we exempt houses this is unfair on people in provincial Nz with similar houses worth 1/3 or less for the same house in Auckland .
    If the intention is to hit the really wealthy with 20million + they can afford the lawyers and accountants to avoid it or leave the country and become tax resident so where else.

    Only Spain and Norway France and Italy are the countries with a net wealth tax which varies depending on where you live rate .2% up to 1.5% but few people seem to pay it, lots of exemptions and ways of avoiding it . In France only land and buildings are taxed in Switzerland all assets are taxed at rates from .13% to 1% depending on the canton. Norway charges 1% and up but with exemptions – many of norways rich have left or are leaving the country . It seems the wealth taxes generate relatively little income in these countries due to problems of assigning values to assets and the exemptions allowed compared to regular taxation.
    A nice idea that appeals to us lowly workers but hard to make work.

  6. A problem with the inheritance tax right now is that a lot of family’s see the inheritance from the grandparents as the only way the kids will be able to afford a house. If the inheritance tax came with the full suite of economic justice policies that would be ok but if we’re sticking with labours incremental approach then we should be talking about a financial transactions tax. After all it’s the financial class that has stolen all the loot not the middle class.

  7. Absolutely discussing stats, National and Labour should be ashamed of themselves. This country will be going no where until the economic cake is decided fairly, and that will never happen under Labour or National.

Comments are closed.