Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

7 Comments

  1. ” A compulsory unit of the Social Studies curriculum is a civics course that explains NZer’s rights as citizens and the importance of democracy as our political system.”

    We want our citizens to learn about democracy by living in one. Having 16 year olds vote could be a logical end product of that.

    But ‘teaching’ democracy? You can say what could and should happen and what democracy could and should look like but democracy is not an academic exercise.

    A bit like bullying. Hekia Parata reckons schools should be doing all this stuff about bullying, and there are some understandings about what bullying is, but she is one of the worst, most consistent bullies in the country.

    And imagine the views of a compulsory curriculum explaining NZer’s rights as citizens and the importance of democracy as our political system being taught by teachers! The “teachers are left-wing socialist scum” brigade who populate places like Kiwiblog would not have that.

    (Although maybe to get around that “teachers aren’t to be trusted” fixation some idiot there will come out with some notion of privatising delivery of that curriculum because then all would be well.)

  2. I don’t see the lowering of the age to 16 as a means of getting the Left elected, that’s not the point of my argument.

    Indeed. I recall being incredibly right-wing in my youth. So much so I probably would’ve made a prime candidate for ‘ACT on Campus’. (I still cringe at the memories of my right-wing utterances.)

    By all means, give the vote to 16 year olds. They pay tax (http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10808314) and taxation without representation is blatantly unjust.

    But it may not produce the results we hope for.

  3. It would allow schools to impart the concept of citizenship while there is still someone around who prizes it. And once the voting habit is established, you’ve got it for life.

    I think it is actually a way better idea than compulsory voting. At least there would be a few serious, if slightly under-informed, classroom discussions of the issues, one would hope, and that may beat the outside world.

    That said, kids often vote their parent’s views, but that would balance itself out, probably and, with luck, leave a return to higher voting numbers. Certainly worth a try.

  4. Trying to fix the political system by adding more voters sounds rather like fixing the economic system by printing more money.

  5. Why not entitle every child to a vote, exercised by their parents, as they are the most ‘invested’ in the future of the country.

  6. Electronic voting should be secure and easy by now and that might get more voters. Shall we vote on it?

Comments are closed.