Similar Posts

- Advertisement -

22 Comments

  1. Voting in bourgeois parliamentary elections is nearly always voting for the status quo in terms of class power.
    A system that historically supports capitalist ownership and appropriation of socially produced wealth will still be there the morning after Election Day.

    It used to be a question of voting for a lesser evil when there was a choice between tories and social democratic Labour. But in our neo liberal Parliamentary consensus arrangement, even the Greens are not anti capitalist.

    But it is still worth voting because even neo liberal Labour will do certain reforms like boost minimum wage, pay equity for carers, increase paid parental leave etc. Nashnull would not do these things and ACT would remove some of them!

    The hope going forward is that new gen voters will rebel against renting over priced dumps for life and thumping great student loans and precarious work with no Basic Income available to tide them over. The boomer tail* will be long but no longer numerically superior so change is now possible in 2023 and 2026–but it will not happen without organisation along class left lines–mark my words!

    * yes for the two boomers (I am one too) that get offended by the term, not all older people are selfish grasping bastards and ladder pullers, some like me have been life long activists and battled against Rogernomics and anything else going.

    1. TM – I’m not sure about this ‘neo liberal Parliamentary consensus arrangement, even the Greens are not anti capitalist.’ Is the coalition agreement such a binding bandage that it cuts off the blood supply to the vital organs of a progressive Party which is what I thought the Greens were/are supposed to be?

      1. Well I don’t know about the MMP arrangements in that respect really apart from the Green MPs I guess, and they are definitely limited by conventions.

        The Parliamentary NeoLib consensus as I, and a couple of other pundits have termed it, is a historical matter really that has evolved over too many years via too many self interested people.

        My partner was a Green member and I did some work to support Sue Bradford’s election campaign when she was in the North at Ahipara a few years back, she is back again in Taipa in semi retirement too. At that time the Green members were active and it seemed a highly Democratic Party too me judging by the meetings I attended. There was the EcoNation 2020 movement and various militants.

        So something has changed in the party by my estimation. Just when a radical anti capitalist Green movement should get mass support, NZ Greens have wussed out and been captured by the “parliamentary road”. The Green Policy is good if you take the time to read it and I will still vote for them for one more election!

    2. Good on you! And I agree with your analysis here, may it admittedly be the lesser of two weevils rather than something truly inspiring, like wot we really do need…

    3. Good on you Tiger M ! And I agree with your analysis here, may it admittedly be the lesser of two weevils rather than for something truly inspiring, like wot we really do need…but ain’t to be seen anywhere. But we must be practical. The other lot absolutely must not get back in so a bit of perspective ISA good thing.

  2. Be careful Labour was also in a death spiral and polling at low as 22, and stole the election 2014. Can happen the other way around.

    There is Trump style anti vaxxing, 3 water power grab, gender transitioning for teens and criminal offences for bad jokes and religion and political views on the way if Labeen get their totalitarian government ideas through.

    Of course Labour and Greens are very hypocritical in many areas, especially on water and the environment, so it’s not just made up from the right.

    There is public downright hatred out there for Labour. I’m surprised at the intensity of it.

    Saying that I despised National when they were in, so maybe that’s what happens at the end of multiple terms. Voters give them the benefit of the doubt for a while, and then send them a message.

  3. Judith ain’t going nowhere people! Got it!?
    She would rather take the whole stinking rotten rusting ship down with her at the wheel than hand it over. And although we badly need an effective opposition to make Jacinda anything, thats anything, at all mind, it couldn’t happen to a nicer collection of creeps than National inc!

    1. I think Crusher must have actually lost her mind under Key’s whiphand. To think they chased Nikki Kaye out of the party, with her proven Ardern-beating pedigree, for this is truly indicative of something rotten and irrational in the party. It’s Weekend at Bernie’s: the political party.

      1. Late reply but to record it: “Chased Kaye out of the party”? Did you mean she was involved in the Michelle Boag private information leak as deputy leader and pulled the pin rather than face the music?

  4. Just listened to Jacinda announcement about allowing hairdressers to open . It shows that there is obviously noone around that table that has the remotest knowledge of what it takes to run a business . Staff rosters buying product organising clients
    suppliers need to ramp up their ordering delivery systems. They were given no heads up. What a shambles.
    Labour did a good job when we were first hit by covid and won an election because of it but they are falling down on the job now. It is a pity National are still not in a position to take advantage of this situation

    The

    1. Don’t worry the Natzos master strategists are beavering away as we speak, developing a massive king hit on the Govt.–“Merv from Manurewa”, Soymun Bridges, Cam Slater-oil, and their trusty assistant–Mr Woodhouse’s “homeless man”…

Comments are closed.