Similar Posts

– Advertisement –

27 Comments

  1. Prosecutors will have to prove intent, did Macleod try to conceal and deceive for pecuniary gain. Is he…the bag man.

  2. MacLeod is either ignorant or arrogant. The most startling aspect to this sordid affair is the bland assurance that there is no conflict of interest. The spin is that it’s perfectly normal for politicians to receive donations from people who are going to receive benefit from the decisions those politicians make. This is the new version of transparency. You pay your money and you get what you want.

    1. Labour get support from unions in the same way as National get theirs from businesses and individuals what is the difference.
      The plus from this scenario is the mistake was picked up,and report on by the National Party so proving we have a very open parliament.
      I note Luxon has reacted straight away and stood their MP down in stark contrast to the Greens .

        1. The left are supposed to be kind and caring but you and your mates want a mistake made as a teenager to follow the person for the rest of his life. I wonder what skeletons you have buried your are you perfect in every way.

      1. Trevor do you actually always believe what you write? How you can compare union organisations to rich self interested people is beyond me. Sure unions have some bad apples but their very existence is not based on me me me.

  3. There are questions to be asked someone said on radio NZ this morning. Where did the money go? Are they allowed to – like they are in the US – keep it and use it to pay for anything they like? That’s how Trump’s legal bills are being paid apparently. Or are they supposed to donate it to a party fund of some sort? Christmas piss up? Genuine questions – I haven’t got a fucking clue.

  4. Labour get support from unions in the same way as National get theirs from businesses and individuals what is the difference.
    The plus from this scenario is the mistake was picked up,and report on by the National Party so proving we have a very open parliament.
    I note Luxon has reacted straight away and stood their MP down in stark contrast to the Greens .

    1. Yes Trevor,
      So what’s your point in trotting out this old Chestnut.
      Unions are providing a service to their members.
      National Party MPs are supposed to provide a service to the country but it seems there view of what country means is limited to those that donate.
      Act is on the gravy train as well, MP Advising Seymour on Pharmacy has business interests in the Pharmaceutical industry.
      Latest on Nats, funding for Bill English inquiry was funded up to $500000 from emergency housing fund. How fucking ethical is that. Stealing from the poor to pay your mates to write a report to fit the question.

  5. Untill the electoral commision has control of ALL campain spending we will be subject to more corruption.Each electorate should have a set amount to spend on campaining which is divided equally between all candidates .No other money can be donated to parties from private people or business .That way there is no way for lobby groups of rich pricks to buy MPs without it being transparent .

  6. The left are supposed to be kind and caring but you and your mates want a mistake made as a teenager to follow the person for the rest of his life. I wonder what skeletons you have buried your are you perfect in every way.

    1. Trevor yes we are kind and caring and we don’t approve of anyone being beaten up with a bed leg especially someone who has been elected to parliament who is being paid by my tax dollars. Yes Trevor maybe some of us have done things we regret however we don’t put ourselves on pedestals and get elected to parliament pretending to be on a law and order ticket blaming Labour as soft on crime.

Comments are closed.